(Death Sa) Shantu 3 - (Earth A) (Sub) Pulli23 0

[Shantu]

Hover over cards for details, click for permalink

Deck import code : [Select]

4sk 4sk 4sk 4sk 52g 52g 52g 52h 52h 52h 52t 52t 52t 52t 52t 52t 542 542 542 542 542 542 542 5up 5up 5up 5v1 5v1 7t8 7ta 7tb 8pt

I generally was quite lucky with my pillars, always drew a lot of them. Then it was only a matter of time till my mummies and dragons outdamaged him. Stealing Plini's discord was quite crippling in the first two games, and a mistake in the third.
Aside the timeout between the second and the third game, the games went smoothly.

Thanks to Mega Plini for subbing.

GGs.

[mega plini]

Hover over cards for details, click for permalink

Deck import code : [Select]

4ve 4ve 4ve 4vl 4vl 4vl 58o 58o 58o 58q 58q 591 591 591 593 593 593 593 5aa 5aa 5aa 5aa 5aa 5aa 5aa 5aa 5aa 5aa 77a 77a 8pj

I tried to lock him down. Didn't work, end of story

[hainkarga]

I'm biased since i don't have any of them, but i'm one of those who believe marks should be banned from WAR if not every pvp event.

[Shrink]

I'm biased since i don't have any of them, but i'm one of those who believe marks should be banned from WAR if not every pvp event.

I'm guessing you're saying this cause those EQs would've done a lot more damage, but I think that people should be able to use Marks within these community pvp events and such. They deserved and earned them.

Also, yay Shantu!

[Calindu]

I'm biased since i don't have any of them, but i'm one of those who believe marks should be banned from WAR if not every pvp event.

Then what will be the purpose of marks?

[ralouf]

I agree with cal. Also using marks mean you can't be subbed too.

Also if they didn't used EQ they wouldn't had issue with marks

[deuce22]

I agree with cal. Also using marks mean you can't be subbed too.

Also if they didn't used EQ they wouldn't had issue with marks

Kind of like using EQs against a General

[Acsabi44]

Kind of like using EQs against a General

Oh, you.

Way to go, Shant!
go