Minotaur | Minotaur

[Xenocidius]

NAME: Minotaur ELEMENT: Time COST: 4 TYPE: Creature ATK|HP: 4 | 4 TEXT: : Labyrinth Move to target adjacent slot. If slot is occupied, kill creature and gain +3/+3.	NAME: Minotaur ELEMENT: Time COST: 4 TYPE: Creature ATK|HP: 5 | 5 TEXT: : Labyrinth Move to target adjacent slot. If slot is occupied, kill creature and gain +3/+3.

ART: http://www.martinhastings.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/minotaur1.png - temporary, http://www.sxc.hu/photo/1160565 (http://www.sxc.hu/photo/1160565) IDEA: Xenocidius NOTES: Example: A Minotaur in slot 1 could target slot 4, 21, 14, 5, 18 or 9. If the slot it targets has a creature in it, that creature dies and Minotaur gains +3/+3. SERIES:

[Kamietsu]

Suddenly Photons being murdered relentlessly. Those poor balls of light

But in other news, Kami thinks this card is pretty good. It might need a cost increase due to scarab spamming, but that's the only real criticism Kami has.

Question time! Can it move onto the opponent's field? Can it move into permanent slots?

[Xenocidius]

3 for +3/+3 each turn? Absolutely broken! Needs nerf immediately!

ಠ_ಠ
As for your questions, no and no. Although both would be extremely fun.

[Kamietsu]

Getting defensive? It isn't broken, but it could have the potential to be too powerful. And 1 for +3/+3 is a bit in its self but the creature sacrifice part balances it out nicely.

[rowcla]

yay for slight counter to AM! (if they AM this guy that I mean, though now that i think about it, you could use this guy to kill your other AM'd creatures...)

[Xenocidius]

Getting defensive? It isn't broken, but it could have the potential to be too powerful. And 1 for +3/+3 is a bit in its self but the creature sacrifice part balances it out nicely.

I'm not getting defensive! Really!!!


Another little balancing factor is that the scarabs (or any creatures) have to be in adjacent slots for the Minotaur to actually eat them. It would require some seriously tricky manoeuvring to be able to eat one each turn.

[Kamietsu]

Getting defensive? It isn't broken, but it could have the potential to be too powerful. And 1 for +3/+3 is a bit in its self but the creature sacrifice part balances it out nicely.

I'm not getting defensive! Really!!!


Another little balancing factor is that the scarabs (or any creatures) have to be in adjacent slots for the Minotaur to actually eat them. It would require some seriously tricky manoeuvring to be able to eat one each turn.

It would be like trying to navigate a labyrin-OH! I get the ability name!

[rickerd]

Wasn't this card allready in the armory or somewhere there?
I like, it but isn't +3|+3 a bit too much?

[rowcla]

Wasn't this card allready in the armory or somewhere there?
I like, it but isn't +3|+3 a bit too much?

I believe that Ghost of the past was inspired by an old version of this card (with a completely different effect obviously) and because of this it was featured with it in reliquary, thats probs what your thinking of

[Rutarete]

So it auto-kills the creature in an adjacent slot? How is it supposed to kill a Chaos Powered Azure Dragon with stats of 14 | 12?

[Hyroen]

So it auto-kills the creature in an adjacent slot? How is it supposed to kill a Chaos Powered Azure Dragon with stats of 14 | 12?

That would be your choice right? Like sacrificing a 16 | 16 Virus.

[Rutarete]

So it auto-kills the creature in an adjacent slot? How is it supposed to kill a Chaos Powered Azure Dragon with stats of 14 | 12?

That would be your choice right? Like sacrificing a 16 | 16 Virus.

Ok, so I messed up my example. I meant to emphasize the Minotaur's killing of creatures without considering Hp.