Fire Guard | Flame Guard

[moomoose]

NAME: Fire Guard ELEMENT: Fire COST: 4 TYPE: Creature ATK|HP: 3|3 TEXT: Frenzied: Successful attacks have a 50% chance to be a critical blow, dealing 2x damage	NAME: Flame Guard ELEMENT: Fire COST: 4 TYPE: Creature ATK|HP: 5|5 TEXT: Frenzied: Successful attacks have a 50% chance to be a critical blow, dealing 2x damage

ART: elements the game, modified by moomoose IDEA: moomoose NOTES: made for the passive skills competition in relation to adrenaline- only the first attack has a chance to be critical SERIES:

[ninjamaster1991]

How does the name correspond with the ability?

Kinda fun, but just a weaker adrenaline.

[moomoose]

i didnt think it was much of a stretch that a warrior devoted to fire would be frenzied.

and its not strictly a ability, as a passive it could be attributed to other creatures in the future.  i am debating between the effect being double damage or a second attack.

(Frenzied:
Successful attacks have a 50% chance to be a critical blow, dealing 2x damage)

[ninjamaster1991]

i didnt think it was much of a stretch that a warrior devoted to fire would be frenzied.

and its not strictly a ability, as a passive it could be attributed to other creatures in the future.  i am debating between the effect being double damage or a second attack.

(Frenzied:
Successful attacks have a 50% chance to be a critical blow, dealing 2x damage)

A: I mean between the name and the ability
B: go with crit.

[moomoose]

not all guards are defensive, and like i said, its not a stretch to associate fire with offense.  guards may be defending something, but it doesnt mean they have to just have a big shield and focus on blocking blow after blow.  saurus temple guards in warhammer for example carried halberds and the only armor they wore was a dinosaur-ish skull on their head.

[Rutarete]

I like it, but i feel the cost should be 1 higher for the upped. Not sure why, just my initial intuition

[Manipul8r]

Meh, a fancy way of giving it 4.5|7.5 damage.  I don't think it's useful enough honestly.

[ZephyrPhantom]

Multiple attack/innate adren is something I find interesting, since it provides good sync with the actual Adrenaline. Upgraded might need +1 cost, but I doubt it considering that OT's cost theory can now get -1 to final value due the Damselfly buff.

not all guards are defensive, and like i said, its not a stretch to associate fire with offense.  guards may be defending something, but it doesnt mean they have to just have a big shield and focus on blocking blow after blow.  saurus temple guards in warhammer for example carried halberds and the only armor they wore was a dinosaur-ish skull on their head.

Why not "Flame Beserker"? It fits more with the skill.

[Hyroen]

If I understand this card correctly, it's slapping Wyrm in the face in terms of power.

[ninjamaster1991]

If I understand this card correctly, it's slapping Wyrm in the face in terms of power.

There's only a 50% chance of critting.

[Hyroen]

For 0 quanta upkeep.

[ZephyrPhantom]

If I understand this card correctly, it's slapping Wyrm in the face in terms of power.

I still think Wyrm needs a buff (especially considering Damsefly), but this isn't the place to discuss that.

In response to this current situation, you could make the ability an active on and have it cost .