Twin-Headed Wyvern | Twin-Headed Wyvern

[ZephyrPhantom]

NAME: Twin-Headed Wyvern ELEMENT: Air COST: 3  TYPE: Creature ATK|HP: 6 | 3 TEXT: Absorbs per turn.	NAME: Twin-Headed Wyvern ELEMENT: Air COST: 3  TYPE: Creature ATK|HP: 8 | 3 TEXT: Absorbs  per turn.

ART: Krava IDEA: Zblader NOTES: With the recent changes made to Dragonfly, I thought it would be interesting to make a card that has good syenergy with that.  Creature dies if you don't have enough quanta to absorb. Inspiration will come today, but don't hold your breath. You'll work well with someone else today. Find that person, and achieve your goals together. SERIES:

Spoiler for Hidden:

NAME: Twin-Headed Wyvern ELEMENT: Air COST: 3  TYPE: Creature ATK|HP: 6 | 3 TEXT: Absorbs  per turn.	NAME: Twin-Headed Wyvern ELEMENT: Air COST: 3  TYPE: Creature ATK|HP: 6 | 4 TEXT: Absorbs  per turn.

ART: Krava IDEA: Zblader NOTES: With the recent changes made to Dragonfly, I thought it would be interesting to make a card that has good syenergy with that.  Creature dies if you don't have enough quanta to absorb. Inspiration will come today, but don't hold your breath. You'll work well with someone else today. Find that person, and achieve your goals together. SERIES:

[icybraker]

For a dragon, it's not very strong

I feel like it's too expensive. Maybe make upkeep 1 even for unupped version or decrease initial cost?

Otherwise, good card and good chance for Damselfly to perhaps make an appearance, although more pillars performs the same effect.

[OldTrees]

I am interested in whether people think this is balanced or not.

[Wonder]

This would work great with the new Damselfly and even though it absorbs 1 per turn, 3  for a 6|4 Creature isn't bad in the first few turns. I feel like this is dependent on the Damselfly though. Having more then 2-3 of these on the field, especially unupgraded, would be a huge burden.

[WhitE-OuT]

Seems quite UP in my opinion.

T-Head Dragon: (3+2x) for 6x damage
Azure Dragon:   10 for 9x damage
x=turns alive

After 4 turns you pay more and do less damage. but this is all assuming your dragons are unaffected by outside forces.
Anyone else?

[Rutarete]

I think the upped is not balanced. The upped i feel should cost 4, because of the 6 attack.
Also- this is much easier to fractal than other dragons- a fractal rush of this is faster than a lycanthrope rush. (granted there is the turn by turn quanta requirement, but if it's a rush as a finishing blow, i think it's OP)

[achangeofpace]

Noob question: Does it die if the air quanta isn't supplied?

[OldTrees]

Noob question: Does it die if the air quanta isn't supplied?

Yes.

[ZephyrPhantom]

Bump for additional feedback before submitting to Crucible.

[DSSCRA]

Maybe make it so they die before they attack if there is not enough quanta.

[Werdbooty]

Interesting factoid:

The Eborsisk
A two-headed dragon, born of a mistakenly launched spell and a troll who got in the way. Created for the movie Willow (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0096446/), the Eborsisk is so-named in honor of famous film critics Roger Ebert and Gene Siskel.

I'm gonna go create a Val Kilmer card now.

[jmdt]

This cards is 'WEAK'

For a pure beatdown card with an upkeep, I expect more bang for my buck.  Frog is 5 attack for 2 cost for a 2.5 ratio and has no upkeep effect.  Frog is entirely better than this card.  As far as 3 cost cards, spider also has 6 attack and also has a web ability which is useful.

'If' the unupped version is decently balanced, then the best balance for the upped version would be a bump to 8 to 10 attack.  Without the extra attack on the upped version, this card is completely useless.  10 attack and say 3 upkeep would be an interesting upgrade if you keep the 3 cost.