Doldrums | Doldrums

[Hyroen]

NAME: Doldrums ELEMENT: Air COST: 3 TYPE: Permanent ATK|HP: TEXT: All the airborne creatures gain +1|+0.	NAME: Doldrums ELEMENT: Air COST: 2 TYPE: Permanent ATK|HP: TEXT: All the airborne creatures gain +1|+0.

ART: www.sxc.hu SPECIFIC: http://www.sxc.hu/browse.phtml?f=view&id=1070418 IDEA: QuantumT & Hyroen NOTES: Doesn't get more straight-forward than this. There's been a lot of talk that Air needs a mass buff card, here it is. Functions the same as Nightfall | Eclipse, but instead of buffing Darkness and Death creatures it buffs airborne creatures. Yes the art is the same as another one of my cards, but this one is here to stick around.

[funerallaughter]

The Phantom Tollbooth is my favourite novel!!

That said, is it stackable or does it hold the same mechanics as Eclipse?

[Hyroen]

Same mechanics as Nightfall | Eclipse. Thanks I should mention that in the notes.

[DSSCRA]

 i think doldrums might not be a good name for this


maybe something more like "jet stream"


only reason i say that is

"The Doldrums, also called the "equatorial calms", are the calms and light baffling winds"


not exactly an area air creatures would want to be in


Edit: on a side note doldrums gives me an idea for a lime card it would either restrict cards both players could lay per turn or be like a 2-3 turn silence that silences you and your opponent

[EvaRia]

I see no reason to not make them stack.

So, why not?

[rowcla]

hooray a way to improve my ffq deck (which is 100% airborne)

[Hyroen]

[snip]
not exactly an area air creatures would want to be in
[/snip]

Light and baffling gave me the idea of "invigorating" as opposed to an area of impending doom. Meh, if more people are opposed to the name a poll will appear.
Poll posted for its ability to stack. c:

[rowcla]

[snip]
not exactly an area air creatures would want to be in
[/snip]

Light and baffling gave me the idea of "invigorating" as opposed to an area of impending doom. Meh, if more people are opposed to the name a poll will appear.
Poll posted for its ability to stack. c:

stacking will make Rol/Hope decks even scarier, two of these and its as good as a filled board of fireflies, eep

[ZephyrPhantom]

When you  take Nightfall/Eclipse into consideration, it shouldn't be stacked.

Also, keep the name, it sounds cool.

[Onizuka]

stacking will make Rol/Hope decks even scarier, two of these and its as good as a filled board of fireflies, eep

I wouldn't actually find that scary.
You would need two of them to actually accomplish anything in most FG battles (Most have 2 damage blocking), besides dimension shield. Plus, you'd either be forcing your deck to become much (towers+doldrum) or running it off your mark (Losing the aether quantum)

[rowcla]

stacking will make Rol/Hope decks even scarier, two of these and its as good as a filled board of fireflies, eep

I wouldn't actually find that scary.
You would need two of them to actually accomplish anything in most FG battles (Most have 2 damage blocking), besides dimension shield. Plus, you'd either be forcing your deck to become much (towers+doldrum) or running it off your mark (Losing the aether quantum)

im sure people could get enough quanta for fractal without the mark

[funerallaughter]

For some reason I had left out "borne" from "airborne" the entire time and thought that it only affected Air creatures o.O""

I'm not too sure whether or not stack-ability would warrant a cost increase; there are a surprising amount of airborne creatures out there...