Timebot | Timebot

[QuantumT]

NAME: Timebot ELEMENT: Time COST: 2 TYPE: Creature ATK|HP: 4|2 TEXT: Attack is set to 0 after a successful attack. Recharge: Timebot gets +4/+0	NAME: Timebot ELEMENT: Time COST: 2 TYPE: Creature ATK|HP: 6|2 TEXT: Attack is set to 0 after a successful attack. Recharge: Timebot gets +6/+0

ART: QuantumT Open for submissions. IDEA: QuantumT NOTES: Antimatter attacks count as successful (like they do for pufferfish). SERIES: N/A

[~Napalm]

I like it once again, but I may have seen something very similar to it somewhere. I can't seem to remember. You could have been explaining this very card to me though

Time could use some cheap creatures like this

[SeddyRocky]

Love the concept, simple and very much in tune with the target element.

[Rooftrellen]

Interesting, but might be a bit too fractalable.

I can just imagine...This, fractal, sundial, end turn, sundial, charge, sundial, charge, do this until you can TU (or just stop preventing attacks) to victory.

[QuantumT]

Interesting, but might be a bit too fractalable.

I can just imagine...This, fractal, sundial, end turn, sundial, charge, sundial, charge, do this until you can TU (or just stop preventing attacks) to victory.

The sundial angle is something that I missed. I reason I made it successful attack is that I wanted it to be able to buff itself if the opponent had a Dim. shield out or something.

Perhaps just change the reset to end of turn?

[Kuroaitou]

CURATOR COMMENT
-Please use the '|' or pipe symbol to divide your stat values in the ATK|HP section of the table

I like it once again, but I may have seen something very similar to it somewhere. I can't seem to remember.
[snip]

Armory Card by kevkev60614 - Tick | Tock



? Probably not that similar at all, but I can definitely relate the concept of 'rebooting' a clock to make sure it keeps working.

That said, buff cards are just terrible to have with this card ironically enough, as the attack will keep getting reset to zero. That's a pretty fun concept, although its cost could be raised slightly for both versions considering the attack-cost ratios.

Cute art as well. ^^ One thing I do wonder though; do 'antimatter' (negative) attacks count as being 'successful'? Seeing that a Pufferfish can still afflict the opponent with poison even though it has its attack value lowered into the negative value, I wonder if the mechanic can technically be a great counter towards Antimatter decks, as it keeps resetting to zero regardless of how you buff (or lower) its attack stat.

[DeviousDragon98]

Recharge + Lobotomize 

[QuantumT]

Recharge + Lobotomize 

I intended for the attack reset to be passive.

What do other people think? Should the attack reset be active or passive?

[Nepycros]

If the reset is passive, and the recharge is active, lobotomizing it would mean it would never be able to get away from 0. Demonic.

[QuantumT]

If the reset is passive, and the recharge is active, lobotomizing it would mean it would never be able to get away from 0. Demonic.

Also true. It's amusing that to me that if the ability is active, than it might be too good and if it's passive it might be terrible.

I do like people's input though. I think that's how good cards get made.

[smuglapse]

If the reset is passive, and the recharge is active, lobotomizing it would mean it would never be able to get away from 0. Demonic.

Also true. It's amusing that to me that if the ability is active, than it might be too good and if it's passive it might be terrible.

I do like people's input though. I think that's how good cards get made.

Time as a whole is already susceptible enough to lobo.  I think you should make it like 'steam' in that the increase and decrease are part of the same skill.

Voted.