More meat on my claim? I'd love to.
Exact wording of PM? no can do, as per Linkcat's illuminating post. My main claim this round is that Sol is town. Unfortunately, I do see how this could sound like Mafia defending Mafia. Which is why I offered to be lynched instead if there is doubt. This I'll get back to in a bit.
Yes my claim is odd, but so have many of the abilities. According to UTA, his ability allows him to stab someone 3 times and then they go bye bye. I would not at all be surprised if this were an ability, because instakill would simply be too strong. So I'm guessing the 3 use rule is a way to balance it. Similarly, though I haven't played Mafia (the forum game) in a while I do imagine that there is some sort of investigatory role. Unfortunately, this role would seem to require at least a 3day use (as no strong claims have been made earlier) and the user likely can't see the results. So naturally, this puts me in a difficult situation, because I can't say it was me who used the ability, and I have to put my blind faith in this voice that tells me that Sol is town. Oh, and being unable to quote what I got makes it even harder to believe me.
Which brings me back to my previous point. If I were Mafia, trying to defend Sol, another Mafia, then it would be ludicrous to ask everyone to lynch me instead of Sol. In this case, town has the option of lynching Mafia or Mafia so it is win, win.
However, I ask that because I know that people may doubt me, and that's perfectly fair. But whether I get lynched or Sol does, the truth will come out and at least one of us will be believed by town.
As such, civs, my plea is not that you remove your vote from Sol and I because I'm trying to defend him, but that you at least shift your vote from Sol to me.
Consider how difficult it would be to allow someone to post their findings on who is mafia and who isn't if nothing can be quoted and nothing can be guaranteed. This is not a time for town to treat such a strong claim so lightly and even though it isn't a strong claim against someone, it is a strong claim for someone.
Once again, other leads -against- someone are welcomed.