Light (JCJ v hain)
Unless we're fearing a wild Mirror (or even Reflective!)-based deck or Tinkerer is required somewhere else (which is probable, since I've got nothing to say against pitting our Tinkerer DeVamPatience against Air), I'm inclined to Unstable Nymphs (although Blue Nymphs still have some decent direct offensive presence). If Tinkerer is required somewhere else, though, gotta run something else ^^;
Aether (Rulac v US1990)
Nymphcord (Requires Lieutenant, Upgrades, or two downgraded cards): If we can afford it to lessen RNG reliance, I'm thinking of swapping one Toadfish for another NT (probably not, since our NT stock isn't really safe). Otherwise, cool as is.
Poison Dial (Requires Mercenary): ... (couldn't think of a comment)
Life (Gen. dd v ESR)
*checks Vault -> swears silently for our lack of mass creature control methods, particularly Flooding (a decent anti-Fractal measure)*
Too bad Life's more wide than tall (and don't let me get into FrogTal or the likes!), which makes Serpentine not an option if that deck's not used elsewhere.
Couldn't think of any new discussion material, unfortunately.
Time (me v Gen. Spike)
Somehow, I'm inclined to Serpentine 'em if that's not used elsewhere and we don't expect them to GhostMare us. (PC would be essential to dismantle an already-established Serpentine. CP Dune can't afford to include BE in it, Momentum Dune must resort to (preferably upped) Shards of Focus, and as for Explosions ... I couldn't think of a Time/Fire synergy that doesn't involve Grabbows.) I mean, the things worth Fractalling for them (Dragons and Ghosts) are rather expensive for Fractal material ... which makes me suddenly shivers for the possibility that they'll throw a GhostMare-brand curveball on us when we're anticipating their stall.
Air (Spiel v Gen. Afda)
As I said up there on Light, nothing to say against DeVamPatience ... assuming we can afford to fix the Tinkerer there.
At any rate, prayer and dinner breaks notwithstanding, I'd expect myself to be available on my usual times (that is, 1800-2200 UTC+7/1100-1500 UTC) for testing. I've got nothing against the term GMT, but I found expressing British Summer Time as equivalent to GMT+1 a bit awkward when Greenwich itself also observes British Summer Time.