Round 4 - Main Topic

[treebeard xiii]

Deckout is a thing in this game, tree, if your deck is larger than your opponent's, you don't use the ice bolts for damage, you use them as creature control, and damage is not the primary objective, stopping your opponent from damaging you is.

And no, our vault isn't that bad, it's just we don't have enough toadfish to support every deck. If you really want toadfish in that deck, suggest a way to do so.

I'll be on before the deadline to finalize everything.

I'm speaking from my limited war experience with our sancstall iirc we used it 2-3 times last war it only started winning when I shrunk it down to a sancrush as a stall it lost everytime I may be wrong but i recall we had limited success with our attempts to stall last war. Also we saw how well our last attempt to deckout went lost 3-0 didn't it yet as a rush it won I dunno but from my experience we'd be better of with a rush. I do recall you saying I'll leave it to you and I see remnants of my suggestion but ultimately it is a different deck but hey if the team thinks it's a better idea I guess we're stuck with it. I don't see a major chance of even slowing up what dark has sent against us so far with that deck permas will get stolen no doubt over sancs any day so after that what have we got for slowing up our opponent six ice bolts that is not efficient enough so we end up having to rush with 4/40 damage sources plus any bolts we have spare. no offence but in anything but a counter matchup that deck will struggle to win. Thats my opinion but people with more war experience must know better even if that experience isn't with water.

I know this seems like I'm just raging but personally I am yet to see a water deckout that wouldn't have won by damage yet the idea seems that every single sanc duo has to be deckout the honest fact is they don't light duo can rush as hard as any other element I understand we must be running low on the whole mid range hitter front because we use them in most of our decks but are we so short we have to resort to a deckout that will struggle to outdamage if necessary. It's all well and good having a deckout as a definite potential outcome but if it can't outdamage reliably what's the point.

[Spielkind]

ohh hell... me need a sub!!! sorry for that, but mathman and me couldnt find a time and now im not available tomorrow afternoon till deadline... :-(

asked him for salvage, will see what he will answer... sorry team, hope that didnt happen!

[rob77dp]

ohh hell... me need a sub!!! sorry for that, but mathman and me couldnt find a time and now im not available tomorrow afternoon till deadline... :-(

asked him for salvage, will see what he will answer... sorry team, hope that didnt happen!

What is mathman's availability he has communicated to you, Spiel?  This will help the team decide who can sub.


I can be available 04:30GMT ~ 08:00GMT 11/11 (i.e. starting about 7 hrs from this message timestamp)...


--Rob

[treebeard xiii]

ohh hell... me need a sub!!! sorry for that, but mathman and me couldnt find a time and now im not available tomorrow afternoon till deadline... :-(

asked him for salvage, will see what he will answer... sorry team, hope that didnt happen!

I got time to sub pretty much anytime before deadline

[Spielkind]

sorry but me saw just now that 21hours on deadline... but that wont work for me tomorrow.... will try to get a sub, if you would get us salvage cause me subbed rob already?!
plz answer me what to do. will get someone for you in time then!

greetz
Spielkind

I can be online from now (2300gmt) to about 8gmt (that is 2am my time, so not much later as i need some sleep), and can be available (after my sleep) from 1400 gmt to deadline.

I cannot make the decision on behalf of my team, but I think they would be ok with granting full salvage to you if you guys win. I will message them and see if anyone responds.


--mathman

[ddevans96]

Spiel, you able to play now? If not, I'm ready.