Flooding | Inundation

[xdude]

Alternative art is epic.

[CelestrialDreamer]

i prefer the 2nd one too
the 1st card gives me creeps
maybe "that thing" is an octopus? (probably not, it got huge nodes at the end of the tentacles)

[killsdazombies]

k my banner is gone
any way this card is fun in trainer very fun when fighting incarnate

and the 2nd art is the best

[Thalas]

That second is really great.

[zanzarino]

The "thing" in the alternative art would be a water elemental

[xdude]

For consistency's sake, it should NOT affect immaterial creatures.

[icybraker]

For consistency's sake, it should NOT affect immaterial creatures.

Seconded.

The "thing" in the alternative art would be a water elemental

Whoo! I'm right!

Everyone seems to like the 2nd art more... perhaps a POLL would work?

[bigbadbanana]

The second art is definitely better. The water elemental looks....different.

This card is waaaaay too OP. Just combine this with bonewall, aflatoxin, and condors and you have just won the game. Maybe you could increase the cost, and say that it absorbs 5 per turn? I dunno.

[Delreich]

For consistency's sake, it should NOT affect immaterial creatures.

All automatic effects affect immaterial creatures (shields, nightfall, bonds, boneyards, etc). For consistency's sake, it SHOULD affect immaterial creatures.

Balance might be a reason to have it not affect them, but consistency isn't.

[icybraker]

All automatic effects affect immaterial creatures (shields, nightfall, bonds, boneyards, etc).

Rain of Fire?

And how does Boneyard affect immaterial creatures?

[Delreich]

RoF is a spell, i.e. something you activate yourself. Boneyards generate skeletons when EPD's die, no?

[xdude]

Considering that immaterial creatures are... well... immaterial, it only makes sense that they can't drown. Also, them being affected by shields also makes sense, and so on.

So, there is consistency in making sense

^lame