Flooding | Inundation

[RavingRabbid]

flooding buff !
but i still think it's to weak .
once the opponent has 7 creatures you're dead most of the time so it's still a dead card to me.

FG plays a lot of creatures.

There's no FG that would really suffer from this. Ferox and Miracle, maybe.

[Falcon4415]

And Decay, FQ, Paradox...

[gavsword]

Show me a deck that makes this card relevant against FG's and I'll stop saying it needs a buff. But currently, it still needs a buff.

[Uncle Jellyfish]

What if Flooding generated water quanta instead?

Even with 1 upkeep, or even with no upkeep, the card will still be underused. Since Flooding results in a huge pool of water, why not make it so that it generates by some method?

Perhaps it could generate 1 for every creature killed? Also, I'm thinking that this card might be pretty useful with the new Skull Buckler....*trainer time*

[Neopergoss]

Also, I'm thinking that this card might be pretty useful with the new Skull Buckler....*trainer time*

I was just thinking the same thing. Add aflatoxin/grey nymph, too? Pretty decent combo, or at least a lot better than it was a few days ago. Remains to be seen how well it will work but I'd like to try it when I have time. Plus freezes will help the aflatoxin kill more effectively.

[edunavas]

Also, I'm thinking that this card might be pretty useful with the new Skull Buckler....*trainer time*

I was just thinking the same thing. Add aflatoxin/grey nymph, too? Pretty decent combo, or at least a lot better than it was a few days ago. Remains to be seen how well it will work but I'd like to try it when I have time. Plus freezes will help the aflatoxin kill more effectively.

Flooding don´t kill malig cells

[Neopergoss]

Also, I'm thinking that this card might be pretty useful with the new Skull Buckler....*trainer time*

I was just thinking the same thing. Add aflatoxin/grey nymph, too? Pretty decent combo, or at least a lot better than it was a few days ago. Remains to be seen how well it will work but I'd like to try it when I have time. Plus freezes will help the aflatoxin kill more effectively.

Flooding don´t kill malig cells

That's what skull buckler is for  (not for killing them but for rendering them useless)

[kobisjeruk]

skull buckler doesnt kill malignant cells either
unless zanz change it somehow it wont do anything to creatures with 1 attack

[Falcon4415]

Show me a deck that makes this card relevant against FG's and I'll stop saying it needs a buff. But currently, it still needs a buff.

Submerged Blizzard (http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,16288.msg222607#msg222607)

Death Star (http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,17207.msg233964#msg233964)

Just sayin'

[Glitch]

I liked it better when flooding killed malignant cells.

Show me a deck that makes this card relevant against FG's and I'll stop saying it needs a buff. But currently, it still needs a buff.

The point of this game isn't to grind FGs.  I can use this with a death nymph and a bonewall to completely lock you down, and then laugh as you slowly poison to death.

[Neopergoss]

I liked it better when flooding killed malignant cells.

Show me a deck that makes this card relevant against FG's and I'll stop saying it needs a buff. But currently, it still needs a buff.

The point of this game isn't to grind FGs.  I can use this with a death nymph and a bonewall to completely lock you down, and then laugh as you slowly poison to death.

Maybe I should've taken flooding instead of wings in your pvp event.

[ddevans96]

What if Flooding generated water quanta instead?

Even with 1 upkeep, or even with no upkeep, the card will still be underused. Since Flooding results in a huge pool of water, why not make it so that it generates by some method?

I actually like this idea. Maybe every water creature gives to the owner each turn? It would help buff icebolt even more too