Tsunami - fastwater rush

[RavingRabbid]

Ver3

by RavingRabbid

Hover over cards for details, click for permalink

Deck import code : [Select]

6rk 6rk 7gk 7gk 7gk 7gk 7gk 7gk 7gk 7gk 7gk 7gm 7gm 7gm 7gm 7gm 7gm 7gt 7gt 7gt 7gt 7i6 7i6 7i6 7i6 7i6 7i6 7i6 7i6 7i6 8pp

Stats:

26 games
6,48 ttw
57,46 Time To Win
25 wins
3 Ems

Ver2

by RavingRabbid

Hover over cards for details, click for permalink

Deck import code : [Select]

5ie 5ie 5ie 5ie 6rk 6rk 7gk 7gk 7gk 7gk 7gk 7gk 7gk 7gk 7gk 7gk 7gk 7gk 7gk 7gk 7gk 7gm 7gm 7gm 7gm 7gm 7gm 7gt 7gt 7gt 8pp

Average turns to win: 5,95
6
6
7
7
5
6
6
5
5
5
7
6
6
6
7
6
5
5
5
6
8
5
7
5
8
5
7
5
8
6
5
6
5
6
6
7
6
6
5
5

Ver1

by RavingRabbid

Hover over cards for details, click for permalink

Deck import code : [Select]

5ie 5ie 5ie 5ie 5ie 6rk 7gk 7gk 7gk 7gk 7gk 7gk 7gk 7gk 7gk 7gk 7gk 7gk 7gk 7gk 7gk 7gk 7gm 7gm 7gm 7gm 7gm 7gm 7gt 7gt 8pp

Average turns to win: 6,7
6
7
7
7
6
7
6
6
6
7
5
10
6
6
7
8
9
6
6
7
7
5
8
6
6
7
6
6
9
6

Side notes: 8 and 9 against Freezeful AI3, 10 was a no creature draw.

[nilsieboy]

it's a great deck,i have one like this to but then with 1 dragon and one longsword more.

[RavingRabbid]

it's a great deck,i have one like this to but then with 1 dragon and one longsword more.

Dragon consume lots of quanta, it's hard to play one.

[guolin]

Looks very interesting. I've always assumed that Toadfish, even considering its ability, is inferior to the Abyss Crawler, but this deck uses both! I could see a PvP version with a Permafrost in there somewhere, because this deck just feels too...non-Water-themed.

I may start upping cards for this as an alternative PvP deck.

[RavingRabbid]

Looks very interesting. I've always assumed that Toadfish, even considering its ability, is inferior to the Abyss Crawler, but this deck uses both! I could see a PvP version with a Permafrost in there somewhere, because this deck just feels too...non-Water-themed.

I may start upping cards for this as an alternative PvP deck.

This was an attempt to see how fast could water get.


I think that 6,7 it's good for a "control" element.

[Xssh]

Lol I'm gonna do what everyone else does...+8 pendulums -8 pillars
Unless you have no pendulums upped, then stick with the pillars. 

[BC]

Really that hungry for water quanta? Seems like you could switch to air mark and actually have some CC, since you will be drawing a lot of unwanted towers mid-game.

[Blasting-Light]

-8 Towers and +8 Water pendulums? If so, change your mark to air if you want CC.
Looks like a solid deck. Better then my other Mono-Water deck.

[willng3]

-8 Towers and +8 Water pendulums? If so, change your mark to air if you want CC.
Looks like a solid deck. Better then my other Mono-Water deck.

That's done to prevent Earthquakes from destroying all your Towers more often.  You have 2 Towers and 1 Pendulum matching your mark and your opponent will be forced to waste one more Earthquake/Quicksand to get rid of your 3 quanta producers.

6.7 is nasty for a deck, nice job RR.

[Blasting-Light]

That's done to prevent Earthquakes from destroying all your Towers more often.

Yes, I know that, I was just adding the pendulums to have some CC.

[RavingRabbid]

Ok, the sample size is small (20 matches.)

5,8 TTW guys. It's the first mono-water reaching under 6 ttw I think.

[nilsieboy]

Ok, the sample size is small (20 matches.)

5,8 TTW guys. It's the first mono-water reaching under 6 ttw I think.

who says water can't rush now