First of all, congratulations for 
winning the most exquisite contest, their deck was really interesting, I supported
them with my vote as well. Other than that I'm really disappointed, whoever thinks that a free creatures + sopa or
overdriven titans or fire's utterly crappy immo deck or a stock mitoscarab deck are THAT more interesting than
an entro otk deck? No merit in these votes if they turn into sympathy votings. 
Whomever thinks that their deck is best because it's theirs and is a concept not really used in a certain element, even if the deck itself isn't really anything new, deserves no sympathy.
Oh, here we go again.
1) I haven't claimed that our deck is the best. (See "THAT more interesting".)
2) It is extremly controversial to lambaste entro otk for the same reasons you could also lambaste those other decks.
3) I'd like to see a stat about how many times did teams play an OTK deck (other than
) in all Wars. Especially Instosis.
4) If we look through decks we can see that only Link's deck falls into the somewhat new category, it has won deservedly.
5) Yes, I voted for our deck. See reasons in 3). The only really frustrating thing awarding that with 0 vote.
That post is incredibly disrespectful and sounds more like being sore about losing than anything, Wyand.
I think I'm allowed to complain about getting 0 votes. All I see in the votes that Link > stock deck > stock deck etc.etc. >> stock deck.
Voicing that isn't disrespect. I haven't seen that much really creative deck in War14. Time's big quanta denial deck in R5 was interesting.
Time playing with SoR Eggs was also something to note. Aether's R1 Wise Deja try. Mindgate usage also from them in RoL Hope. UG in SoFree
deck from
. Light's SoV was surprisingly effective. But these decks weren't nominated.
Poll
