Gravity Aether. I got that real cheap

[neuroleptics]

Gravity Aether. I wanted to put this is a very old post but considering that would be necro..... so i decided to put this up. Frankly i have never tried using the basic weapons until now.

Hover over cards for details, click for permalink

Deck import code : [Select]

6rl 6rl 6rl 6rl 6rl 6rl 74a 74a 74a 74a 7n2 7n2 7n2 7n2 7n2 808 808 808 808 808 808 808 808 80d 80d 80d 80h 80h 80h 80h 8pl

If you have SoW, take out the unstoppable, if you wanna put in Sofreedom is ok too!!! but i prefer Shard of Focus. fell fee to tweak that. 4 SoFocus + take out Dims and 2 towers and put in cards you want. If not, i would have considered overdrives

Inspired by the creativity of furballdn http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,42014.0.html, i decided to challenge myself using non-rares

Spoiler for Hidden:

Player
Wins: 89
Winrate: 89 %
Average TTW: 11.134831460674157
EMs: 5
EM rate: 5.617977528089888 %

Computer
Wins: 11
Winrate: 11 %
Average TTW: 16.90909090909091
EMs: 3
EM rate: 27.272727272727273 %

But i was let down by the TTW.... no idea how to make it faster tho

[Annele]

About the necro:

If you hit reply on an older thread you receive the following message:

Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 60 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.

This is a good opportunity to assess whether your post really adds value.  However, replying in old posts is explicitly allowed in the Mono-decks, Duo- decks, Trio- and Quartet- decks, Rainbow decks, and Deck Compilations sections.  Posting your thoughts/deck version/experiences in the outdated thread is much preferred over creating a separate thread.

Though this deck looks nice.

[neuroleptics]

About the necro:

If you hit reply on an older thread you receive the following message:

Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 60 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.

This is a good opportunity to assess whether your post really adds value.  However, replying in old posts is explicitly allowed in the Mono-decks, Duo- decks, Trio- and Quartet- decks, Rainbow decks, and Deck Compilations sections.  Posting your thoughts/deck version/experiences in the outdated thread is much preferred over creating a separate thread.

Though this deck looks nice.

I don't think there exist a exactly same deck idea as i have posted. Anyhow, i don't agree, it's necro is such deck ideas that gets unwanted attention. Whilst there's no such problem if you necro in general discussions,  or others, no one can stop you there but i don't wanna visit those places too often as they don't contribute to my understanding of this game. However, thanks for the comment on the deck.

[Dm]

Not a duo. Animate Weapon is a air card; therefore this belongs in the trio section.

Apart from that, I don't find the concept of the deck different or original. It's a good deck, it works, but I find it rather... bland. Blank? "Meh." Don't know the word.  But still, good deck; it works, so no complaints though. I don't see anything to change or add :/ . Slightly prone to RT (4 quints 6 gavels) but I don't think you'll be flying all 6.

Also, I'm pretty sure I've seen a similar deck somewhere, with overdrive instead of unstoppable... hmm.

[neuroleptics]

Not a duo. Animate Weapon is a air card; therefore this belongs in the trio section.

Apart from that, I don't find the concept of the deck different or original. It's a good deck, it works, but I find it rather... bland. Blank? "Meh." Don't know the word.  But still, good deck; it works, so no complaints though. I don't see anything to change or add :/ . Slightly prone to RT (4 quints 6 gavels) but I don't think you'll be flying all 6.

Also, I'm pretty sure I've seen a similar deck somewhere, with overdrive instead of unstoppable... hmm.

Yes, the only thing is that it doesn't use air quanta, so, i don't considered it as  .
I see, anyhow, i have the Dims in case of bad draws

[Rutarete]

A deck type (in these regards) is defined by how many elements it has, not what quanta is used/generated.

[Dm]

Not a duo. Animate Weapon is a air card; therefore this belongs in the trio section.

Apart from that, I don't find the concept of the deck different or original. It's a good deck, it works, but I find it rather... bland. Blank? "Meh." Don't know the word.  But still, good deck; it works, so no complaints though. I don't see anything to change or add :/ . Slightly prone to RT (4 quints 6 gavels) but I don't think you'll be flying all 6.

Also, I'm pretty sure I've seen a similar deck somewhere, with overdrive instead of unstoppable... hmm.

Yes, the only thing is that it doesn't use air quanta, so, i don't considered it as  .
I see, anyhow, i have the Dims in case of bad draws

If I fill my deck with 24 gravy pillars and 6 gravy fireeaters and use fire mark, it's a mono, and not a duo. If I use 24 gravy pillars and 6 upgraded sundials, it's a duo; not a mono.

Cardz not quanta

[neuroleptics]

ok, then this should be trio. Can any1 move this? Thanks and sorry for the trouble. 
However, if you tweak that into short bow plus air mark, that should do fine as a Duo.
The basic idea is not to add in rares.