I've been testing this deck due to a debate I had with mesaprotector in chat over whether this was better than instosis and splat or not. So far I'm at 20 wins 7 losses, with 16 of those being EMs. It clearly EMs way more than those decks, and the win percentage is fairly similar to instosis, although I haven't gotten most of the problematic gods yet.
Also, how the bloody hell did you beat Elidnis THREE times with this? When discussing with mesaprotector, I figured sosa dials should beat any FG without feral bonds or miracles, but that those would prove serious problems. I've managed to do alright against even miracle-using gods, and other than once vs hecate, I've never lost in 27 games to an FG without one of bonds or miracles.
This is an example of what keeps happening with Elidnis. (it also happened with fire queen, only worse, since queens breed; I haven't seen ferox yet, but it'll be even worse than elidnis, since ferox has more creatures) I locked him down to 3 creatures, but he's still got enough bonds I'll never win even with a near-perfect draw. Even 5-6 healing/turn is enough that you can't win in time, so unless Elidnis got 0 bonds in 3 games, I don't really see how it could be done :p
It's definitely a nice deck, though, no question. I'm just unsure whether it's really better than instosis (which is probably like 70% win rate at least, though I haven't crunched the numbers) or Splat. SPlat seems better to me in most cases except against dark matter, which is basically an instant loss for splat, but sosa dials should still have a chance.