the angels of fury

[lmao427]

by lmao427

Hover over cards for details, click for permalink

Deck import code : [Select]

77c 77c 77c 77j 77j 77j 77j 77j 7an 7an 7an 7an 7an 7bu 7bu 7bu 7bu 7bu 7bu 7jo 7jo 7jo 7jo 7jo 7jo 7jo 7jo 7ju 7ju 7ju 7ju 7ju 8pm

send out an angel adrenaline it so it does 15 damage a turn repeat use quicksands as soon as you can to slow down enemy from getting quanta

[Chapuz]

Basing on the 2 BoL decks and this one in just a few days, I can see you are a good deckbuilder!

Although, AdrenaShreikers would be more effective though more vulnerable to CC.

[Rutarete]

Although, AdrenaShreikers would be more effective though more vulnerable to CC.

Not by much, if they are more effective at all - you only gain a tiny bit more speed with the duo-deck. Angels have more damage and are more stable.

[Chapuz]

Although, AdrenaShreikers would be more effective though more vulnerable to CC.

Not by much, if they are more effective at all - you only gain a tiny bit more speed with the duo-deck. Angels have more damage and are more stable.

Yeah well, you know earthquakes should be played early =)

[TheIdioticIdiot]

the title is very misleading, I was expecting rage pots

[lmao427]

the title is very misleading, I was expecting rage pots

what's a better name then?

[furballdn]

the title is very misleading, I was expecting rage pots

This. Why not use unupped shriekers with adrenaline? Why angels? Just because of their high health?

[Chapuz]

what's a better name then?

Earth breaking angels.

[Calindu]

It would be a pretty good without earth part and with some stalling power(heals, miracles).

[ralouf]

yep the earth part isn't bad but looks useles in this deck. I'd rather go for light mark and use crusader + staff because this a good combo IMO

[furballdn]

yep the earth part isn't bad but looks useles in this deck. I'd rather go for light mark and use crusader + staff because this a good combo IMO

Making it a trio seems unnecessary really. The especially sticks out as being quite odd.