Nymphomania (anti-FG) + stats

[darkfrogger]

i was responding to thakog and the flashes could be useful for healing the liquid shadowed creatures. i don't really know, i was just thinking of some way he could heal the critters

[Demagog]

The deck I'm running is this:

Entropy mark
7 Am. Towers
6 Sap. Towers
5 Ob. Towers
3 Aether Towers
5 Tears
4 Quints

I might take out one obsidian tower and replace it with a quint, but other than that it's pretty good. I'm not sure how it will compare yet to a version with supernovas, but taking them out hasn't hurt me yet. Most of the FG's you can actually beat with this type of deck are slow, so by the time they put you in danger you usually have what you need on the field. Taking out supernovas allows you to draw a card you actually need, especially if it's later in the game and you need another quint to play your dark nymph.

A few other things one could try on this particular variation (no novas) would be to tweak the amount of towers in conjunction with adding in another quint, and maybe playing with different marks... aether, entropy, and water marks all seem like good choices in their own way. Since the mark I'm using is entropy, it would probably help me more to turn one amethyst pillar into a sapphire pillar...

Just a thought, here's another variation:

Aether mark
7 Am. Towers
7 Sap. Towers
5 Ob. Towers
5 Tears
6 Quints

Or convert one obsidian tower and one quint into aether towers if you're afraid you'll be running low on aether quanta, and it doesn't hurt to run a 32 card deck either, since you have tons of healing. With that aether mark variation, you have a pretty good chance of having at least one of each of those cards in your hand when you start, which is the problem with the version using supernovas: you often don't get what you need for several rounds.

Anyway, have fun testing this version if you're interested.

[mafidufa]

Demagog, have you been keeping stats for that version?
This is my stats page for the supernova version
http://elementsstatistics.comxa.com/getstatistics.php?dv=2203490327 (http://elementsstatistics.comxa.com/getstatistics.php?dv=2203490327)
I have a 40% win rate (currently 38 since I had a recent run of bad luck)

[Demagog]

No, I'm still tweaking it. I think I may have settled on a version I like though, I'll try to get some stats for it this weekend.

Are you including games against the FG's this deck can't beat?

[blu]

This is the best deck ive played for Gods. Ive been playing it for about 4 days started with like only 4 cards upped in the deck and rest unupped after selling my pain in the ass rainbow deck of randomness and started this deck to try it out. I was sick of rainbow deck being so random on my 10 card draw (10 card draw is most important for winning vs god) and in 4 days I followed the godlines he gave and have a fully upped deck now and little over 6k points for new upped for my top50 deck. Its not 100% on 6-8 gods all the time but it works if your 10 card draw is right vs them everytime I losted with the deck is only cause bad draws or just the wrong god which you cant beat with this deck. For the most part im very happy with the deck and it will stay my god deck untell something else comes along which is better ( I won't count on it anytime soon)


Thanks for the deck maybe Ill post my top50 deck soon when its done and Its no rainbow trash

blu

[mafidufa]

yes, I auto-quit against divine glory, hermes, dark matter and usually scorpio (though I have won a game against scorpio, its just not very repeatable) but I do include them as losses.

[Jangoo]

Demagog, have you been keeping stats for that version?
This is my stats page for the supernova version
http://elementsstatistics.comxa.com/getstatistics.php?dv=2203490327 (http://elementsstatistics.comxa.com/getstatistics.php?dv=2203490327)
I have a 40% win rate (currently 38 since I had a recent run of bad luck)

Something ist weird with that calculation. Like why does the statistics-programm claim that 66/192 games won is 37%???  It's more like 34% actually ...

[Delreich]

It's not total win rate, it's the average win rate (not including opponents not yet faced, but that's irrelevant in this case).

[Getawu2]

Those who use Pulverizer: Have you been thinking about adding a second Pulverizer? Helps a lot against Ferox, for example.

FFQ is beatable too with a bit of luck: But you have to play a black nymph first so you can prevent FQ-spawning.

[Demagog]

FFQ is beatable too with a bit of luck: But you have to play a black nymph first so you can prevent FQ-spawning.

Actually if you get lucky enough to put out a purple nymph before or the turn after FQ plays her first and, hopefully, only ffq for several turns, AND you have the towers to support anti-matter, you're pretty much golden... I've done that ONCE lol... with the no-supernova deck too, which is often a turn or two slower (but it's more efficient in terms of quanta, I think...).

[MrSexington]

I don't know what to say.

Either you guys are doing something I'm not or I just really suck at this game.

I played different variations of the decks listed here:

1. I just went through 1500 coins and I only won 1 match.
2. I didn't win the spin.
3. In the 50 games I matched with "hard" or "impossible" FGs in more than 30 of those games.
4. In the games that I played, in all but 3 games, I failed to draw both a Quintessence and a Nymph's Tears in the top 15 cards.
5. In the 3 games where I did draw them both, I either:

A: Ran out of before I could I could turn the tide.
B: Was facing an "easy" opponent who played Fallen Druids who undid any and all effectiveness on my part.

Maybe I'm just extremely unlucky.

[darkfrogger]

i have all the cards upped except the pillars and im too lazy to upgrade all of them for maybe a 5 percent better win percentage
time to up my pvp deck
this deck is the best god farming deck imo