Another of those "typical" newby decks I often encountered in PvP1 (
http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,36224.0.html). The category "45 cards or more with no time drawing power" had a success rate of 8% against the decks of less than 35 cards I tested in my study (reminded me to add this stat).
If you want to make it a reliable one, reduce the size to less than 40 cards (or you need to take time mark and hourglasses), ideally 35 or less.
Make a choice about your strategy, instead of using a little of everything (make either a mutation deck or a mindgate deck, or an immortal deck, trying to mix the 3 won't be efficient). Personnally I'd consider making it a fun mutation deck : remove all the immortals creatures, the lycanthrope and the dragon, as well as the mindgates, keep just the photons take 6 mutations, one fractal and the parallel universes -casting parallel universe on a mutant gives you another different mutant ; eventually keep the quintessences for the best ones).
Try to have a pilar ratio of 35% at least (I'd even say 40% with spells as costly as fractal, and especially if you keep your 2 kinds of pilars design -I'd rather use pendulums). Actually your deck has only 28% of pilars, and your chance to find enough entropy to make your dissipation shield usefull (I mean make it last more than one turn against average opposition) are extremely small. And I'm not even speaking of using both your shield and the amethyst dragon.
You may remove the quantum pilars and novae* as you use quanta of only 2 elements if you chose to make an immortal deck, or keep them for mutants abilities/mindgate cards.
(* the novae may eventually have an use to counter devourers based deck and speed start a little, even if you only use 2 elements, but still it's very situationnal for the card space they take)
