Saderheit [Fire/Light/Air]

[ProBacon]

Hover over cards for details, click for permalink

Deck import code : [Select]

7dg 7dg 7dg 7dg 7dg 7dg 7dg 7dg 7dg 7dn 7dn 7dn 7dn 7k5 7k5 7k5 7k5 7k5 7k5 7la 7la 7la 7la 7la 7la 7la 7n2 7n2 7n2 7n2 8po

Before you go all "Bacon, this deck, is the worst. It sucks and has not reason to be a deck." I did this for a friend. But I still stand by it and its 9.78 TTW (VS AI3)

I truly don't care if you give me feedback on how to make it better, because like I said, it was for a friend.

But THANKS! anyway if you did give me feedback.

Hover over cards for details, click for permalink

Deck import code : [Select]

7dg 7dg 7dg 7dg 7dg 7dg 7dg 7dg 7dg 7dl 7dl 7dn 7dn 7dn 7dn 7jo 7jo 7jo 7jo 7jo 7jo 7k5 7k5 7k5 7k5 7k5 7k5 7n2 7n2 7n2 8po

This is a fixed version that does a bit better with some protection and light reliability.

[Zyardran]

Thank you Bacon

[Solaris]

I'd wager that you end up a bit hard-pressed for Light quanta? Upping the 'saders helps a bit, since Endow drops a , but, I still feel like you're strained in the long term.

[joebob555]

It would probably be a good idea to replace one of those Animate Weps with a Tower or Pend.

[Sera]

I'd add some control. The deck takes some time to setup and has nothing to protect you for that long.

[Foraker]

I like to use just pends in a "duo" like this.
Earthquake wrecks you way more than it does with your build.
But imo it's overall more stable.
Using Blessing on a flying weapon to get the buff on the crusaders too, is also nice (doesn't Vader Sader base on that?).

If I had to built it, I would go with something like this:

Spoiler for Hidden:

Hover over cards for details, click for permalink

Deck import code : [Select]

7dn 7dn 7dn 7dn 7dn 7jv 7jv 7k5 7k5 7k5 7k5 7k5 7k5 7la 7la 7la 7la 7la 7la 7la 7la 7la 7la 7la 7la 7la 7n2 7n2 7n2 7n2 8po

Maybe I would replace a Fahrenheit and an Animated Weapon with two Explosions.
Imo they are also more useful than the two Fire Bucklers in your fixed version.

[ProBacon]

I like to use just pends in a "duo" like this.

The reason I didn't use any pends in the second version is because you gain quanta for each element faster. That is well needed for fire because that is the whole basis of this deck.

[Foraker]

The reason I didn't use any pends in the second version is because you gain quanta for each element faster. That is well needed for fire because that is the whole basis of this deck.

True. I've recognized that while testing my suggestion.
There's never enough  to make a good use of fiery.