Phase 2 - Community Vote

[twinsbuster]

I think Kael has too much work to do in the forum already.

[BluePriest]

I think Kael has too much work to do in the forum already.

AS of right now, my votes for BS, but I think this is a horrible reason to not vote for kael. Its like punishing him for being a curator/moderator

[twinsbuster]

I think Kael has too much work to do in the forum already.

AS of right now, my votes for BS, but I think this is a horrible reason to not vote for kael. Its like punishing him for being a curator/moderator

you can't say it's a punishment as I think he can benefit the community better in other ways.

[homoaddictus]

I just want to remind everybody that we are allowed to change votes.

So keep the discussions flowing.

[RavingRabbid]

Mh, I have to vote.
Now, a small question.





What does Darkness lack in elements the game as now?

[Kael Hate]

Mh, I have to vote.
Now, a small question.





What does Darkness lack in elements the game as now?

Misdirection.
Thats why in my card ideas for the trials, I suggested Obfuscation.

[RavingRabbid]

2° question:


  doesn't sinergize well with  .

If you were forced to make a 33% deck with 50% darkness, what would you do?

[Kael Hate]

2° question:


  doesn't sinergize well with  .

If you were forced to make a 33% deck with 50% darkness, what would you do?

Running Water Cards with Darkness is going to be a limitation with no direction to follow. If forced to take Water element then we would need to take things that are best of use regardless of relation. This means that I'm going to have to take Water Pendulums, Permafrost and Purify.

[Bloodshadow]

What does Darkness lack in elements the game as now?

Stealth and subtlety, I'd say. There is no "shroud" card that allows you to hide things.

doesn't sinergize well with  .

If you were forced to make a 33% deck with 50% darkness, what would you do?

I'd probably take Mark of Water and some Freeze for cheap creature control. Also, like Kael said, Water Pendulums and Ice Shield. Maybe a Nymph Queen to make some Black Nymphs.

[DrunkDestroyer]

I care nothing, whatsoever, about Christianity as a whole.  

This line lost you my vote.
I was supporting you, but at this point I'd rather vote for kilfer, as the underdog. He might not be scrapping over the piece of meat like the other two dogs, maybe it's a strategy, to let the "strong" fight each other off, make mistakes, and then leave him able to clean up and take the kill.
And that is what darkness is about, not being the strongest, but using the opponents streghnths against them, or against each other.
Whether this is intentional or not, I don't know.
But I am not voting for who I previously thought was the only real Master of Darkness.

[Bloodshadow]

Your bluntness astounds me. I'm not bothered by you being atheist; in fact I have many atheist friends. But I am bothered by you being a "vehement" atheist that cares "nothing" about Christianity. A true leader (and I believe masters should have leader qualities) should be sympathetic and understanding, not biased and unmoving. A good atheist leader, in my view, would be one that reads the Bible in an attempt to understand more about Christianity and empathize with them, even if he disagrees with them.

I wasn't being sympathetic toward you because you weren't on my "team". If we were in some sort of group that requires us working together, then I would gladly put aside this difference of religion, and mostly other differences, in order to benefit us all.

As I said before, I was merely stating my own opinion, because that really is what I think about religions. It's personal, and it is not relevant when I am working with people or leading a team. Again, I would gladly put aside differences of religion in order to benefit my group.

[Azumi]

Your bluntness astounds me. I'm not bothered by you being atheist; in fact I have many atheist friends. But I am bothered by you being a "vehement" atheist that cares "nothing" about Christianity. A true leader (and I believe masters should have leader qualities) should be sympathetic and understanding, not biased and unmoving. A good atheist leader, in my view, would be one that reads the Bible in an attempt to understand more about Christianity and empathize with them, even if he disagrees with them.

I wasn't being sympathetic toward you because you weren't on my "team". If we were in some sort of group that requires us working together, then I would gladly put aside this difference of religion, and mostly other differences, in order to benefit us all.

As I said before, I was merely stating my own opinion, because that really is what I think about religions. It's personal, and it is not relevant when I am working with people or leading a team. Again, I would gladly put aside differences of religion in order to benefit my group.

Bloodshadow is very blunt. I like that in a person. Sometimes sugar coating is nice but I like someone that is willing tell you to ^(%* off when that's what he thinks.

Religion shouldn't be a factor. For those US players here you saw what the opposition tried to do to the now president obama about his religion being a problem if he got elected. Think of master as president. Religion opinions have nothing to do with being a master. Acceptance of other religions is requires though, and it would be idiotic to reject players (in the war) b/c of thier religion.