| ENTROPY :entropy |
|
Why ban discord and black hole? I think just banning discord would do a good enough job.i think because it can counter novas
Why ban discord and black hole? I think just banning discord would do a good enough job.Banning Discord means that the opponent can't ruin mono's or duos by scrambling quanta.
I was just wondering, thanks for clearing it up, not to proficient at deck building.Why ban discord and black hole? I think just banning discord would do a good enough job.Banning Discord means that the opponent can't ruin mono's or duos by scrambling quanta.
Banning Black Hole means that the opponent can't ruin -rainbows- by absorbing quanta used from Supernova.
Both are valid choices in an Entropy Trial in my honest opinion. ;)
Gah. I'm sorry, I slept right through our scheduled time. I'm available;I'll be waiting then.
1400GMT tomorrow for 2.5 hours,
1130GMT Tuesday for two hours, (I'd rather pick any other time)
1400GMT Wednesday for five hours,
not at all Thursday
Most of Friday and Saturday
Between 2300GMT and 300GMT any day.
4vg 6ts 6ts 6ts 6ts 6ts 6ts 6ts 6ts 6ts 6tu 6tu 6tu 6tu 6u5 808 808 808 808 808 808 808 808 80d 80d 80d 80i 80i 80i 80i4vg 6ve 6ve 6ve 6ve 6ve 6ve 6ve 6ve 6ve 6ve 6ve 6ve 6ve 6ve 808 808 808 808 80d 80d 80d 80d 80d 80j 80j 80j 80j 80j 80jThis is a deck that is only effective when you know your opponent is going to use entropy. He used his poison stall again. His Sogs really saved him. I couldn't get past his healing. He ended up with 33 poison counters when I decked out.500 6ts 6ts 6ts 6ts 6ts 6ts 6u2 6u2 6u2 6u2 6u2 6u2 6u7 6u7 7q0 7q0 7q0 7q0 7q0 7q0 7q8 7q8 7qb 7qd 7qd 7qd 7qd 7qd 7qdThis is a simple deck - counter to the deck-outer deck. It was also my wild card. The name comes from a simple fact "Entropy will reduce our Universe to nothing if given enough time". I decided that this kind of power would be enough. You want to play a dune scorpion + chaos power early to bit him. And then play antimatter, if he puts up a dissipation shield. He used some sort of Flying Pulverizer + Wings deck. I think his only entropy cards were supernovas and pendulums. He didn't stand a chance against my poison.4vf 6tv 6tv 6u1 6u1 6u1 6u1 6u1 6u1 6ve 6ve 6ve 6ve 6ve 6ve 6ve 6ve 6ve 6ve 6ve 6ve 7t9 7t9 7tb 7td 7td 7td 7tf 7tf 7tfThis is a simple creature spam deck. He used a supernova rush. His deck was faster, but he mis-clicked once and I luckily won.500 500 500 6ts 6ts 6ts 6ts 6ts 6ts 6ts 6ts 6ts 6tu 6tu 6tv 6tv 6tv 6tv 6tv 6tv 6u8 6u8 6ve 6ve 6ve 6ve 6ve 6ve 6ve 6veAnother simple deck. Amiir didn't change his deck here. And again, he make a mistake. He used 2 lightnings on my first dragon and made me play a nymph next turn. That nymph was making him reluctant to use lycantropy or evolution of his creatures. That gave me enough time to win.Congrats Zeru. That must have been a really close match at the end.It was extremely close. Just look at my screenshot.
Wow.... basically that's the only combination of creature attacks (if 50% of them were to miss) you could have had and survived. Congrats Zeru and what a matchup.Congrats Zeru. That must have been a really close match at the end.It was extremely close. Just look at my screenshot.
I've been asking everyone else, would you both like to explain your ban choices and how it affected your deck-building?Discord, Quake, Black Hole - I decided that I will use decks that need a lot of quanta to work, I couldn't allow a single method of quanta denial.
So exactly what happened with those Precogs then? It show you one hand, but he had another? Or it showed that he drew one card, but he really drew a different card? That seems a little odd. And I totally understand about being dissed by Lady Luck. It sucks . . . a lot.Nope, in both cases I drew the key card right after his scan.