3rd Trials - Phase 4 - Final Battle

[xdude]

I noticed in the first post it said something along the lines of "you can't ban other cards". That was actually an edit fail, so if you intended to ban SoG's (or other) but didn't because of that, feel free to PM me again.

[nilsieboy]

rav and me decided on msn that we'll ban SoG to (the same as majofa and girls).
gl everyone .

[RavingRabbid]

Ho del legname in più scrive:
*Have you read what have majofa and GG done?
nils scrive:
*what's up?
*the SoG ban?
Ho del legname in più scrive:
*Yeh.
*Shall we do this, too?
nils scrive:
*i'm ok with that
*shall we ban dragonflies to? xD
Ho del legname in più scrive:
*Naw, I was planning on using dragonflies.
nils scrive:
*you to o.o
*i thaught i was original...
Ho del legname in più scrive:
*So, we have 6 official bans + 1 unofficial SoG ban.
nils scrive:
*yes
*shall i post it?
Ho del legname in più scrive:
*We're going both to post it, I think.
**Copypastes MSN log

Quick notice: Ho del legname in più it's me.
Nils is nilsie.

[xdude]

rav and me decided on msn that we'll ban SoG to (the same as majofa and girls).
gl everyone .

Me and Ryan randomly decided to ban pi cards. 

[pikachufan2164]

Higs and I have both agreed to not use SoG and save the ban slot for something more useful.

Do we want to consider a mutual implicit ban of SoG for the Final Battle?

Yeah, those things are just boring. Begone with them, I say!

[10 men]

I don't understand this. You have 6 banslots. That's 6 times more than you need to ban SoG. Why this special treatment?

[Zeru]

I don't understand this. You have 6 banslots. That's 6 times more than you need to ban SoG. Why this special treatment?

Opens room for backstabbing of course 

[xdude]

I don't understand this. You have 6 banslots. That's 6 times more than you need to ban SoG. Why this special treatment?

It makes them sound more pro.

[MrBlonde]

I don't understand this. You have 6 banslots. That's 6 times more than you need to ban SoG. Why this special treatment?

I pretty much agree with this statement. I just figure it's 5 bans (which is more than enough) and ban SoG.

[xdude]

I don't understand this. You have 6 banslots. That's 6 times more than you need to ban SoG. Why this special treatment?

I pretty much agree with this statement. I just figure it's 5 bans (which is more than enough) and ban SoG.

I've received some PM's. It's not. It actually is 7 bans.

[MrBlonde]

I don't understand this. You have 6 banslots. That's 6 times more than you need to ban SoG. Why this special treatment?

I pretty much agree with this statement. I just figure it's 5 bans (which is more than enough) and ban SoG.

I've received some PM's. It's not. It actually is 7 bans.

Oh, i just meant from my perspective. I would've said no thanks if i was asked beforehand to ban SoG's. I think 5 bans is more than enough and consider the 6th ban as SoG. If your opponent doesn't think SoG is worthy of banning more power to them and they can use that 6th ban as seen fit.

[GG]

1.27 thread is up...

I'm begining to feel like it may be a better idea to postpone the trials a bit until 1.27 gets implemented...

hopefully it'll be implemented within the next week, since that's when the real battles begin after the two pre-phases.