Western Tournament - October 16- unupgraded - cheapskate

[killsdazombies]

I decided to make it more "Cheap" Its now 5+

While I do appreciate having the tourney up earlier in the week (and that the rule change is happening days before the actual event), it'd be a good idea to have the rules for a tournament settled upon before posting it.

I do ask, why the rule change? It seemed fine the way it was.

a fair number of people wanted it to be cheaper, so i did.

[thraexis11]

So if you have changed the rule to 5+ shouldn´t you update it on tournament info? it still says 6+ on page 1.
Also this rule change will drop  frost and dimensional shield out of the tournament , so more boring speed decks will be played. Bad change IMO, would be more interesting with some shields which could stop graboids and golems.

[Dragoon1140]

Bad change IMO, would be more interesting with some shields which could stop graboids and golems.

What is that one shield that blocks Graboids and Golems for five turns and only costs 4 ?  It may be too obvious for me to remember.

[~Napalm]

Bad change IMO, would be more interesting with some shields which could stop graboids and golems.

What is that one shield that blocks Graboids and Golems for five turns and only costs 4 ?  It may be too obvious for me to remember.

Lol... good point

Btw... there were several, maybe not that posted on this thread, but in chat that wanted it to be 4+... 4+ was actually the original intent of this idea. So consider yourselves lucky... you can still Golem Rush

[twinsbuster]

We do, and you know we do. We almost never change it. As you know, why it had to be changed last week was because it was released in extreme hurry, and needed to be optimised. As I said then, we were lucky to have one at all. There is nothing to stop, since it was a one-time thing, and thus there is no reason to complain. We do this without any reward whatsoever, and we do our best. I'd rather have a late tourny than none, or one with broken rules, and I think most would agree on that.

See? the rule has changed.

[Higurashi]

Yep. Wednesdays are the absolutely final day for changes. We need this period, because the community always discusses the concepts. I agree that this change is unnecessary, since we can have more cheapskate tournies later, but this is what the community wanted. We are servants of the community.

[BC]

5+? This makes me sad. I was gonna ignite some gases at once while hiding behind 6 wings and some fogs. It was like totally unstoppable!

[willng3]

5+? This makes me sad. I was gonna ignite some gases at once while hiding behind 6 wings and some fogs. It was like totally unstoppable!

Until someone pulled out a Pulvy, Deflagration, Butterfly Effect or Steal

[kobisjeruk]

5+? This makes me sad. I was gonna ignite some gases at once while hiding behind 6 wings and some fogs. It was like totally unstoppable!

hey Octane Jr. is my trademark, find your own  :angry:
basically every tourney that allows it, i will always find a way to squeeze in and play some form of Octane-like deck
unfortunately latest changes took out UG :sadface:

[dracomageat]

I see your arguments as this:
"I want a tournament with no restrictions, because I don't have money/skills/adaptability/creativity to prepare a good deck/decks. I really want it. Every week. Therefore all tournaments from now on should be limit free."
Correct me if I am wrong.

I'm fine with just once.

[elements15]

ill do it please

[Zeru]

I see your arguments as this:
"I want a tournament with no restrictions, because I don't have money/skills/adaptability/creativity to prepare a good deck/decks. I really want it. Every week. Therefore all tournaments from now on should be limit free."
Correct me if I am wrong.

I'm fine with just once.

Too late, there already has been one like that. And don't tell me that we could repeat that. We still didn't cover up plenty of interesting rules like "Whoever loses first, wins"