Three-Man Team PvP #6 - RULES

[bripod]

My vote... No Shards...

[Higurashi]

No thanks. Some PvP Events should stay classic.

[dragonsdemesne]

Usually I'm in favour of shards in a restricted manner, but in this event, I'd say no.  The problem is that because people have to stay loyal to a chosen element, they will only have access to a few shards, and the elements with the stronger shards will then get chosen far more.  In an event where players are not so strongly restricted to certain element(s), shards can work, but this isn't one of them.

[Vangelios]

 We do this without shards, after all, been told that shards are banned
this would have to be made before the event, Now if shards are allowed many will give up

but it is good to remember that 2/3 of the community voted events with shards (only to reflect) so it Root recalled

[majofa]

K, there will be no shards in this event.

[dawn to dusk]

Tbh, I was intending not to vote in that section as there was no option saying: depends on event. I ended up voting yes (quite reluctantly) but for this event, I say no

[Higurashi]

- Each deck may use 6 upgraded cards
- You may use Pillars, Pendulums, Mark Cards, and Marks that don't match your 3 elements (they don't count as using the element)
- You may not use the same combination of elements more than twice in a match.

Commenting on three changes: I like upgrades for changing the meta around quite a bit.

Pillars, pends and mark cards from elements you don't have do not count as using those elements, but pillars, pends and mark cards from the elements you do have count as using the element. This is oddly worded, but it has to be this way or else I could easily make monos (e.g. 10 aether pillars and 20 aether cards would be legal otherwise).

I don't like the sounds of this third added rule. It forces you to use your battle element at least once, which increases the RNG impact and reduces the importance of versatility within your own elements. I don't like having less strategic control and more RNG, basically.

[PlayerOa]

I agree with Higs regarding the third rule. Never change a winning team, they say - the two first changes are alright, but I don't like the third one, based on Higs' thoughts.

[Vangelios]

- You may not use the same combination of elements more than twice in a match.
I personally think it's wonderful and will give more versatility for the event.
I do not like to see a BO5 winning  by only a deck

[CrockettRocket]

- You may not use the same combination of elements more than twice in a match.
I personally think it's wonderful and will give more versatility for the event.
I do not like to see a BO5 winning  by only a deck

I think he meant one deck. Anyway I agree.

[Vangelios]

Yes or a specific combination, or a specific deck and if I were to change something I would so

- You may not use the same combination of elements more than one in a match.

However allowing mono as in WC

[Higurashi]

I'd personally like to see either of two changes: remove the rule or allow 3 uses of the same combination per match.

Either way, we need more feedback on this. A poll would be the most accurate way of gauging opinions.