Three-Man Team PvP #6 - RULES

[Dm]

*Posting this identically on both Rules and Round 1 topics*

Can deck Mark be any element or is it limited to a player's "available elements" per match setup?

As written in big red colors in the main post -

- You may use Pillars, Pendulums, Mark Cards, and Marks (quanta cards) that don't match your 3 Elements

I'd assume yes.

[rob77dp]

*Posting this identically on both Rules and Round 1 topics*

Can deck Mark be any element or is it limited to a player's "available elements" per match setup?

As written in big red colors in the main post -

- You may use Pillars, Pendulums, Mark Cards, and Marks (quanta cards) that don't match your 3 Elements

I'd assume yes.

My confusion and request for additional clarification stems from the inclusion of the words changed to RED above.  I've never referred or observed reference to a decks Mark as being a card.  (This is independent of the obviously known Mark Cards which are separately mentioned in the rule quoted here.)

[the dictator]

EAll right, so just to make sure I didn't miss anything (Elements for all examples are and something that's not life, lets say ):

Spoiler for Deck 1:

Deck 1

Hover over cards for details, click for permalink

Deck import code : [Select]

5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5og 5og 5oj 5oj 5oj 5oj 5oj 5oj 5ol 5ol 8pr

Spoiler for Deck 2:

Deck 2

Hover over cards for details, click for permalink

Deck import code : [Select]

5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5l9 5oj 5oj 5oj 5oj 5oj 5oj 5ol 5ol 8pr

Spoiler for Deck 3:

Deck 3

Hover over cards for details, click for permalink

Deck import code : [Select]

5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5l9 5og 5og 5oj 5oj 5oj 5oj 5oj 5oj 5ol 5ol 8pr

Deck 1 would be illegal because it only uses 1 element, Deck 2 would be illegal due to having more than 2/3rd cards of a single element.
Deck 3 is legal: it has 2 Elements, only quanta cards from the other elements, and no more than 2/3rd of cards in a single deck.

Now, if I would have used a blessed wyrm deck twice earlier in the match, Deck 3 would be illegal, since I already used 2 light/air duo's in this match up.

Did I miss anything?

[rob77dp]

EAll right, so just to make sure I didn't miss anything (Elements for all examples are and something that's not life, lets say ):

Spoiler for Deck 1:

Deck 1

Hover over cards for details, click for permalink

Deck import code : [Select]

5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5og 5og 5oj 5oj 5oj 5oj 5oj 5oj 5ol 5ol 8pr

Spoiler for Deck 2:

Deck 2

Hover over cards for details, click for permalink

Deck import code : [Select]

5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5l9 5oj 5oj 5oj 5oj 5oj 5oj 5ol 5ol 8pr

Spoiler for Deck 3:

Deck 3

Hover over cards for details, click for permalink

Deck import code : [Select]

5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5l9 5og 5og 5oj 5oj 5oj 5oj 5oj 5oj 5ol 5ol 8pr

Deck 1 would be illegal because it only uses 1 element, Deck 2 would be illegal due to having more than 2/3rd cards of a single element.
Deck 3 is legal: it has 2 Elements, only quanta cards from the other elements, and no more than 2/3rd of cards in a single deck.

Now, if I would have used a blessed wyrm deck twice earlier in the match, Deck 3 would be illegal, since I already used 2 light/air duo's in this match up.

Did I miss anything?

So far as I currently understand the rules, I agree with your statements, td. I would also consider ANY mark choice for Deck #3 to remain legal and #1 and #2 to remain illegal.

[the dictator]

Ah, good point yes.
Mark of Aether wouldn't fix the first or second, and the mark of the third wouldn't matter either.

[deuce22]

Not sure if this is something to act upon or not, but their are still a number of players who lost during round 1 that did not post decks... Should there be some sort of penalty for this?

[majofa]

Not sure if this is something to act upon or not, but their are still a number of players who lost during round 1 that did not post decks... Should there be some sort of penalty for this?

From the time of this post: If you do not post your decks by the end of the deadline (or immediately after your match if you need to play after the deadline), you will receive a loss in your match.

[CuCN]

a number of players who lost during round 1 that did not post decks

deuce is asking about players who already lost the matches.

[majofa]

a number of players who lost during round 1 that did not post decks

deuce is asking about players who already lost the matches.

And if you lost the match and didn't post, you will receive an automatic match loss in your next match.

[CrockettRocket]

n00b never posted his decks because he never played his Bo5 out, seeming as how me and DM lost our Bo5 and an incident in his personal life occured we didn't think he needed to play it out against duece and we didnt think we would sub for him when the final result doesnt matter. But if we have to sub for him and play against Duece then post the decks we used for n00bs sake so we dont get another loss surely me or Dm will sub for him.

[deuce22]

If a match is won 2-0, then this is moot. I will just post 3 decks filled with quanta and forfeit 0-3.

[CrockettRocket]

If a match is won 2-0, then this is moot. I will just post 3 decks filled with quanta and forfeit 0-3.

And then n00b/me/dm would post decks too for n00b?