This post is about me and Killsdazombies. If you don't care about our little dispute, I advise you skip it.
Right. If that was smack talk, then your double-action of posting and sending me a whisper in chat is spam. That is not smack talk, and it has absolutely no inflammatory intention behind it. If you would even consider the circumstances under which you won, instead of the simple, surface fact, you might eventually come to agree with me. The only reason I "talked smack", as seen in my saying "Hope you're proud of yourself there, Killsdazombies", was because you didn't seem to at all understand the circumstances that allowed you to win. I was trying to clear that up for you, and that is, in fact, my only intention with these posts. And to be honest, I kind of expected you to smile and say that you were in fact proud of it.
Additionally, your game summaries are extremely misleading. My first game was slow because I drew all of my Pendulums in the first few turns. I like how in the second game, you're focusing on how close you were to winning, whereas you don't even begin to include any circumstances which allowed me to be close to winning in your other summaries. For example, in the third game, you were in a very tight corner. The only thing that saved you (apart from copying my deck) was your Antimatter. Hardly an easy smackdown, and most would consider it a good game, because it actually was pretty close, despite the HP difference at the end, which anybody who has any experience whatsoever with this game knows doesn't mean much. I might be sore about it, but if I was on the winning end of that battle, I would hardly consider it to be an "easy smackdown". And incidentally, if my calling your first deck terrible is to be considered inflammatory smack talk, then calling that match an "easy smackdown" is just as much so.
If you have a problem with me, take it up via PM or chat whisper. You don't need to waste the time or space of this thread.
