Ok, I need an ultimate feedback before tomorrow morning (so for about 9 hours from now) about my plan for this task.
I want to make a comic, JCJ saying "Ok, we are before the city dungeons - dragon's lair. I guess it's full of traps. There is dark there, so Krzy I like you to be our cheap source of light. Aves, use your spelling powers to deactivate all traps. Come back, when the way to the dragon is clear."
Aves: Alright, sir. Krzy, go first please, hehe.
Krzy: I think I dislike the idea :/
And then the sequence of photos take place, after each Aves uses the specific card:
Line trap: any sword
Boulder trap: reverse time (it was kind of a suprise)
Snake trap: I don't know which card to get rid of snakes, but Purify for sure to clean poison fro snake's bite
Cage trap: a one of the destruction card
Toxic pool: precognition, so they know it is toxic
Then wings to get over it.
Blocked passage: pulverizer?
Surprising dragon: Krzy somehow must escape from dragon's mouth
They come back and Aves present the map to JCJ.
End of bard submission.
______________
But now Wizard part seems maybe to be too small?
Now map with hovering photos, but card usage was explained in the comic, so no use of repeating it?
But maybe not seperate the submissions at all and put a map with hovering images as a part of the comic?
Let's say that comic is actually a ONE image and all text is kind of annotation?
The problem is only with how the task is fomulated: "Annotate a
separate copy of the Bard's image"
Fippe, Clean, is our way of doing this submission acceptable? Let's say a comic is unconventional way of doing this task, but is it bad?