Not that surprising.
*Yawn*On that note, people really should test their decks before submitting.
Quote from: Rember on July 13, 2011, 11:23:29 am*Yawn*On that note, people really should test their decks before submitting.obviously it was merely a bad draw, not a bad deck
Quote from: rowcla on July 13, 2011, 12:06:34 pmQuote from: Rember on July 13, 2011, 11:23:29 am*Yawn*On that note, people really should test their decks before submitting.obviously it was merely a bad draw, not a bad deckThe dragon pet had obviously nothing to do with how the game went.
Quote from: Falcon4415 on July 13, 2011, 12:56:40 pmQuote from: rowcla on July 13, 2011, 12:06:34 pmQuote from: Rember on July 13, 2011, 11:23:29 am*Yawn*On that note, people really should test their decks before submitting.obviously it was merely a bad draw, not a bad deckThe dragon pet had obviously nothing to do with how the game went.only a little bit, anyway why does this need a quote?
Quote from: rowcla on July 13, 2011, 01:18:53 pmQuote from: Falcon4415 on July 13, 2011, 12:56:40 pmQuote from: rowcla on July 13, 2011, 12:06:34 pmQuote from: Rember on July 13, 2011, 11:23:29 am*Yawn*On that note, people really should test their decks before submitting.obviously it was merely a bad draw, not a bad deckThe dragon pet had obviously nothing to do with how the game went.only a little bit, anyway why does this need a quote?To be honest, I'm not too sure now (the win is totally legit, what was I thinking? ??? ), but you might have just started a quote chain.