*Author

Active members:
VanWinkle(2)

Offline VanWinkleTopic starter

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 27
  • Reputation Power: 2
  • VanWinkle is a Spark waiting for a buff.
  • Under the Elements' spell since August 2012
Arena Deck Review - Art needs critics https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=46112.msg1033633#msg1033633
« on: January 19, 2013, 10:37:40 am »
As far as I see, this game is primary about creativity. Therefore one could consider every deck built as an unique piece of art. And art needs reviewers to evolve.

While playing against two arena decks today, I noticed, that cards were used , which caused dissonance in the decks strategy. It might be interesting for the owner and everybody else, to see this mistakes. I hope this thread  will help to improve arena deckbuilding.

On the other hand there might be an arena deck, you want to comliment, or you want to make new strategies you've watched public to the community.

I would like to know the opinion of other players concerning my arena decks, for I'm quite unexperienced concerning that.

so far .... Van Winkle





Offline VanWinkleTopic starter

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 27
  • Reputation Power: 2
  • VanWinkle is a Spark waiting for a buff.
  • Under the Elements' spell since August 2012
Re: Arena Deck Review - Art needs critics https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=46112.msg1033636#msg1033636
« Reply #1 on: January 19, 2013, 10:48:15 am »
For it's my idea I'll make the start:

A Death Mono on Gold league was using Aflatoxin, Skull Shield and soulcatcher. So far so good, could have been hard for my pestal, for the shield would have killed some of my devourer and  provided quanta to the arena deck.

The next turn the ai put out a bonewall, after creating a Malignant Cell. It was a short match. Aflaoxin and bonewall is no good combination in an arena deck. There is a good chance the ai will mess up the game.

(please correct me if I'm wrong)

so far...VanWinkle

 

anything
blarg: