regardless of originality of the deck in question or who created it, it was majofa who took the initiative to start a standard that made it accessible for all to see when they face the oracle
i am definitely not trying to defend majofa but before he put up those oracle:<false god> threads on every friggin FG strat subtopic, there wasnt an easy way and people have to scour through pages of discussion on how to deal with certain FGs...some dont even have a discussion thread in it!
i knew then that people will give credit to him as the OP even if it wasnt him who thought up the actual counter but honestly, if you are honestly trying to help the masses, does it even matter who gets the credit?
of course majofa can do something better than a tiny deck code text that nobody gonna read anyway (maybe, oh i dont know...a bolded Credit:username below the deckcode?) but hey, thats his prerogative ;-)
I never said that starting a thread series like majofa has done is a bad thing. In fact, I have provided decks for him to post in the past. All I am saying is that there should be some clear display of the derivation of the deck suggested. (Do note that I haven't accused majofa of intentionally omitting credit.)
