*Author

Malduk

  • Guest
[Round 2] Malduk 3 - 2 Lava Golem https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=17629.msg224496#msg224496
« on: December 14, 2010, 11:48:54 am »
I never ever had this much trouble in PvP. Servers were on drugs or something. After 462834 desyncs I feel like not playing PvP ever again.  ::)

Anyway, GGs Lava. Firestall is OP, and loses only when it gets stupid draws. Which is actually not that hard, as I just tossed cards in there.

This is my selection of cards:

Code: [Select]
4vj 5f0 5f0 5f0 5f0 5f4 5f4 5f4 5f4 5f4 5f4 5f5 5f5 5f5 5f6 5f6 5f7 5f7 5f8 5fb 5fb 5fb 5gi 5gi 5gi 5gi 5gi 5gi 5gi 5gi 5gi 5gi 5gi 5lg 6rn 6rn 6rn 6rn 6rn 6rn
Code: [Select]
5f9 5f9 5f9 5f9 5f9 5fc 5fc 5fc 5fc 5fc 5fc 61p 61p 61p 61p 61pI removed Reflective shield as I already knew Lava doesnt have one in his decks. Had a spark in its place that I think I never actually played. No idea what happened in game by game as it took us a really long time to finish this.
I know I won game 1 the "standard" firestall way, then lost game 2 against Discord and his super fast rush, then lost game 3 due to drawing 1 or 2 pillars the whole game. Game 4 I had 5 shards in place, so no way to lose that (yay for OP cards), and game 6 crapload of quanta and Fahren did a nice chunk of damage, and bolts came soon after.

I never used Phoenixes, as they werent needed here. I did however put spark/immo combo in the mix in game 3 I think, but never drew any immo.

Offline lava golem

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 706
  • Reputation Power: 0
  • lava golem is a Spark waiting for a buff.
  • Fire
Re: [Round 2] Malduk 3 - 2 Lava Golem https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=17629.msg224497#msg224497
« Reply #1 on: December 14, 2010, 11:53:15 am »
Ugh, despite all the disadvantages, I still cut it pretty close :). SoGs...

Main deck:
Code: [Select]
4sa 4sa 4sa 4sa 4vj 4vj 4vj 4vj 4vj 4vj 52o 52o 55q 590 590 590 5f6 5f6 5i7 5i7 5og 5og 61q 61q 6u5 6u5 77g 77g 7ae 7aeSideboard:
Code: [Select]
4vh 4vh 52q 52q 55t 55t 5c2 5c2 5f3 5ia 5ia 5lf 5lf 5ur 5urI will rise again in the losers brackets  >:D
lava golems are the best creatures in the game cause I said so

Malduk

  • Guest
Re: [Round 2] Malduk 3 - 2 Lava Golem https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=17629.msg224500#msg224500
« Reply #2 on: December 14, 2010, 12:02:09 pm »
Hmhm... I copied deck and sideboard from the "sent message" to kobis, and I somehow included 1 "extra" Phoenix in there. There should be 5 of those (5 sparks, 5 immos, 5 phoenix for a total sideboard of 15).

I just noticed this, and its fair to point it out.
On the other hand, never used Phoenixes, nor were there 6 in use in my prepared decks. Mistake happened while sending sideboard to kobisjeruk obviously. I'll accept any ruling on this though, mea culpa.

Edit: I PMed kobis to check this out.

Offline lava golem

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 706
  • Reputation Power: 0
  • lava golem is a Spark waiting for a buff.
  • Fire
Re: [Round 2] Malduk 3 - 2 Lava Golem https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=17629.msg224508#msg224508
« Reply #3 on: December 14, 2010, 12:30:10 pm »
Well, I think I know what happened here, so you sent kobis a sideboard with 16 cards? Did he notice? Glad you are honest about it. Let's just see how kobisjeruk rules this.
lava golems are the best creatures in the game cause I said so

kobisjeruk

  • Guest
Re: [Round 2] Malduk 3 - 2 Lava Golem https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=17629.msg224528#msg224528
« Reply #4 on: December 14, 2010, 01:31:30 pm »
i honestly not sure how this escape me when i counted everyone's sideboard (and yes, i do count them)
it was my mistake for not noticing them
no change/penalty except malduk sideboard is now

SIDEBOARD
Code: [Select]
5f9 5f9 5f9 5f9 5f9 5fc 5fc 5fc 5fc 5fc 61p 61p 61p 61p 61p
as it should be

Malduk

  • Guest
Re: [Round 2] Malduk 3 - 2 Lava Golem https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=17629.msg224556#msg224556
« Reply #5 on: December 14, 2010, 02:39:25 pm »
Okay then, business as usual. Thank you for the ruling.

 

blarg: