[Series] Alchemic pillar | Alchemic pillar

[Chapuz]

You are making some current duos make their quanta more efficient with this cards, and some current trios way more stable. I like them.

It is more friendly to make them of opposing elements

[abrabam]

Thx Chapuz for the feedback. Yes, the idea occurred to me cause I was trying to make an unupped pvp trio deck (water life entropy) and thought "meh, wish I had an option different from pendulums"...

I have inserted a poll in this thread and then I will update the card-draft in the first post.

[OldTrees]

Thx Chapuz for the feedback. Yes, the idea occurred to me cause I was trying to make an unupped pvp trio deck (water life entropy) and thought "meh, wish I had an option different from pendulums"...

Different types of quanta producers are good ideas, however I think the "excess quanta:desired quanta" mechanic works better as a once per turn Other card that turns  into multiple of target quanta.

[Chapuz]

Different types of quanta producers are good ideas, however I think the "excess quanta:desired quanta" mechanic works better as a once per turn Other card that turns  into multiple of target quanta.

That would make it technically worse than a pillar.

[andretimpa]

Thx Chapuz for the feedback. Yes, the idea occurred to me cause I was trying to make an unupped pvp trio deck (water life entropy) and thought "meh, wish I had an option different from pendulums"...

Different types of quanta producers are good ideas, however I think the "excess quanta:desired quanta" mechanic works better as a once per turn Other card that turns  into multiple of target quanta.

http://elementscommunity.org/forum/pre-smithy-ideas/quanta-distiller-quanta-distiller/
^ this never got off the ground

[OldTrees]

Different types of quanta producers are good ideas, however I think the "excess quanta:desired quanta" mechanic works better as a once per turn Other card that turns  into multiple of target quanta.

That would make it technically worse than a pillar.

Thx Chapuz for the feedback. Yes, the idea occurred to me cause I was trying to make an unupped pvp trio deck (water life entropy) and thought "meh, wish I had an option different from pendulums"...

Different types of quanta producers are good ideas, however I think the "excess quanta:desired quanta" mechanic works better as a once per turn Other card that turns  into multiple of target quanta.

http://elementscommunity.org/forum/pre-smithy-ideas/quanta-distiller-quanta-distiller/
^ this never got off the ground

You both misunderstood.
The quanta type would be chosen each time the activated ability was activated and would have at minimum a 1 :2 ratio(more likely a 2:5 or 1:3 ratio).

[Fippe94]

So, just like my submissions for Brawl Round 5? Problem with a ratio of 2:5 and 1:3 is that it would make the card superior to a pillar. Pretty much any mono deck would be better off replacing 6 pillars with it. That's why I used 2:3 ratio.

[OldTrees]

So, just like my submissions for Brawl Round 5? Problem with a ratio of 2:5 and 1:3 is that it would make the card superior to a pillar. Pretty much any mono deck would be better off replacing 6 pillars with it. That's why I used 2:3 ratio.

That was it. I knew I had seen it somewhere(even checked the Card Designer submissions for Brawl). Yes Quantum Focuser is a 1 card version of this entire 12-66 card series.

[dworthy]

Something I've noticed. With the circular quanta concept, you could use a to produce infinite quanta, so long as you have enough of those Alchemic Table cards. Of course, it could be solved by having a limited amount of uses for the Table card.