(Underworld) Lt. Sevs 2 - 0 kevkev60614 (Death)

[Sevs]

Code: [Select]

4sa 4sa 4sa 4sa 4sa 4sa 4sa 4sa 4sa 4sa 4sa 4vl 55q 5c1 5c1 5f6 5f9 5f9 5f9 5og 5og 5ro 5up 5v1 622 622 622 7ds 7ds 7ds
I had luck on my side with the pillar draws. something i was a little worried about coming into this match. but got 3 the first tie and 4 the second. definitely lucky.

Game 1
extremely close but had immolation and phoenix in my hand for the longest time till i could fractal. He never drew a shield but didnt have an attack miss till the last turn when all of them missed. he only needed 2 of the 3 to hit. Fractal phoenixs did the damage to win. An early arsenic was stolen

Game 2
had 2 haxx shields and he deflaged 1 so i played the other. an eternity stalled him for a couple turns while he waited for a deflag. I didnt draw any creatures for a long time so i decided to fractal his dragons. played momentum on 1 so he couldnt rage it. and the next turn played another. replaced the eternity with discord. just outdamaged him. no shield played by him again.

Good sportsman and great deck. I have to give thanks to the UW deckbuilders. they made a great deck.

[kev]

by kevkev60614

Hover over cards for details, click for permalink

Deck import code : [Select]

52g 52g 52g 52g 52g 52g 52g 52g 52g 52h 52h 52h 52h 52t 542 542 542 542 542 5f6 5f6 5f6 5fb 5fb 5fb 5fb 5fb 71a 71a 71d 8po

[phaedrus]

Well done Sevs!
Glad there were no quanta issues.
 

[LongDono]

Congrats sevs! I was a little worried!
Kevkev, better luck in your next duel, I believe sevs had an advantage with his deck so don't worry about a single loss.

2 people I respect played eachother, good match you two.

[Neopergoss]

Phew, still in this war. Tough luck, kevkev. I'm honestly surprised we won this one  As they say, RNG giveth and RNG taketh away. I wish matches could be recorded because I would've really liked to have watched this one. It was actually kevkev who got me to join war so he's someone I regard most highly.

[Higurashi]

Nice, dangerous decks both. I'm impressed by UW; I expected this deck against me this round, but they were more clever. x)
Some Bone Walls for kev would've made this even more interesting.

[Sevs]

@ Higs We expected the bonewalls hence the fractal. and minor phoenixs.
@ Neo  more importantly we  have 60 cards so unless we incur some penalty we should be fine for a least 2 rounds + how many we win which is all of them.

[kev]

I believe sevs had an advantage with his deck

I disagree.  Just due to the nature of the deck it felt during the match like I was getting beat by vault vomit.  I was hugely annoyed, so after the match I tested the deck matchup a bunch in trainer.

I think I was a favorite, but it's not nearly as bad as my inital assessment.  The UW deck plays a lot better than it looks on paper imo.  Plus it was helped by 2nd turn PC both matches to take my upped arsenic, early fog both matches, and way too much friggin quanta for me the 2nd match (I think I counted 11 pillars/pends in first 15 cards).

No excuses, though.  Props to UW for building it and to sevs for playing it so well. 

[SteppingStone81]

Just due to the nature of the deck it felt during the match like I was getting beat by vault vomit.

The UW deck plays a lot better than it looks on paper imo.

All of the UW decks kind of look like vault vomit (probably due to their deckbuilding restrictions), but the decks are dangerous and play surprisingly well.  Props to them and good luck to them in their matches next round!

[Higurashi]

You should see the PhoeniXplosion I trained against.. actually, you shouldn't.

[Sevs]

I believe sevs had an advantage with his deck

I disagree.  Just due to the nature of the deck it felt during the match like I was getting beat by vault vomit.  I was hugely annoyed, so after the match I tested the deck matchup a bunch in trainer.

I think I was a favorite, but it's not nearly as bad as my inital assessment.  The UW deck plays a lot better than it looks on paper imo.  Plus it was helped by 2nd turn PC both matches to take my upped arsenic, early fog both matches, and way too much friggin quanta for me the 2nd match (I think I counted 11 pillars/pends in first 15 cards).

No excuses, though.  Props to UW for building it and to sevs for playing it so well. 

Just due to the nature of the deck it felt during the match like I was getting beat by vault vomit.

The UW deck plays a lot better than it looks on paper imo.

All of the UW decks kind of look like vault vomit (probably due to their deckbuilding restrictions), but the decks are dangerous and play surprisingly well.  Props to them and good luck to them in their matches next round!

Thank you both. And yea our decks look way strange but as SS pointed out the 3 of a card in a rainbow thing makes it looks ridiculous you just cant rely on 1 combo to work ever. Props to you too kevkev, it is great and very successful deck

[LongDono]

I believe sevs had an advantage with his deck

I disagree.  Just due to the nature of the deck it felt during the match like I was getting beat by vault vomit.  I was hugely annoyed, so after the match I tested the deck matchup a bunch in trainer.

I think I was a favorite, but it's not nearly as bad as my inital assessment.  The UW deck plays a lot better than it looks on paper imo.  Plus it was helped by 2nd turn PC both matches to take my upped arsenic, early fog both matches, and way too much friggin quanta for me the 2nd match (I think I counted 11 pillars/pends in first 15 cards).

No excuses, though.  Props to UW for building it and to sevs for playing it so well. 

Just due to the nature of the deck it felt during the match like I was getting beat by vault vomit.

The UW deck plays a lot better than it looks on paper imo.

All of the UW decks kind of look like vault vomit (probably due to their deckbuilding restrictions), but the decks are dangerous and play surprisingly well.  Props to them and good luck to them in their matches next round!

Thank you both. And yea our decks look way strange but as SS pointed out the 3 of a card in a rainbow thing makes it looks ridiculous you just cant rely on 1 combo to work ever. Props to you too kevkev, it is great and very successful deck

Yea I think RNG might have been on our side here. Also what Sevs said, thanks you two. ^^
@Kevkev, looking again and the fact that you did test you are most likely right. Sorry it had to be this way.
@SS, Yes our decks would be deadly but wow, the 3 card limit is VERY hard to get around round after round. The basics of deck building is to find a combo that works and play it, when you are limited to 3 of a card this gets insane.