(darkness) 9270984 2-1 (life) ratchetspyro94

[TheCrazyMango]

Regardless of any improbabilities which occurred here, won fair and square; congratulations are in order to both them and 9270984.  Good try Ratchet, it's unfortunate but these situations are to be expected.

thank yoou willing3. ratchets deck was a good deck, and it was really close for the last two games

[wizelsnarf]

I am not trying to take away from your win.

Obviously the decks were evenly matched as you played 3 times.

Whether it was luck or whether your deck was indeed better, you guys won.

It just hurts so much more when Life has been losing a lot and we have all these close losses.

[QuantumT]

I am not trying to take away from your win.

Obviously the decks were evenly matched as you played 3 times.

Whether it was luck or whether your deck was indeed better, you guys won.

It just hurts so much more when Life has been losing a lot and we have all these close losses.

I can understand the sentiment. It's one thing when you have no chance, but when you get so close it's painful.

[ratchetspyro94]

Yeeeep and those games were fun and aggrivating but mostly fun. And yet are decks were both monos. 

[kobisjeruk]

Regardless of any improbabilities which occurred here, won fair and square; congratulations are in order to both them and 9270984.  Good try Ratchet, it's unfortunate but these situations are to be expected.

longcat is long
good sportsmanship is good

[Boingo]

Just a conjecture, but is this a case where adrenaline is better than more creatures in a mono life deck?  Wondering if more attacks helps with haxxor shield problem.

On a different note, good to see monodecks are still being played.  I barely remembered what they looked like at this point in the War.

[kobisjeruk]

Just a conjecture, but is this a case where adrenaline is better than more creatures in a mono life deck?  Wondering if more attacks helps with haxxor shield problem.

On a different note, good to see monodecks are still being played.  I barely remembered what they looked like at this point in the War.

nay
i believe they didnt go with adrenaline approach due to our own counter to adrenaline in R1 - vs
we lost the match but it left quite a mark
credit for this deck goes to our rookie, we let him decide what he wanted to play and we, as team help him tweak the deck to meet PvP standard
looking back, the only time he lost a match with a deck not by his choice was last round using a deck i suggested (oopsie! :s)

[TheCrazyMango]

Just a conjecture, but is this a case where adrenaline is better than more creatures in a mono life deck?  Wondering if more attacks helps with haxxor shield problem.

On a different note, good to see monodecks are still being played.  I barely remembered what they looked like at this point in the War.

nay
i believe they didnt go with adrenaline approach due to our own counter to adrenaline in R1 - vs
we lost the match but it left quite a mark
credit for this deck goes to our rookie, we let him decide what he wanted to play and we, as team help him tweak the deck to meet PvP standard
looking back, the only time he lost a match with a deck not by his choice was last round using a deck i suggested (oopsie! :s)
[/quote
kobis mrblonde himself said that my deck would win 8 out of 10 times against his deck. your deck was really good though i just didnt draw enough pends.

[MrBlonde]

kobis mrblonde himself said that my deck would win 8 out of 10 times against his deck. your deck was really good though i just didnt draw enough pends.

Agreed. Kobi's deck should have beat mine. And i think i said 7 out of 10 (not that it really matters).