Elements the Game Forum - Free Online Fantasy Card Game
Elements the Game => Battle Results => War Archive => War => Events and Competitions => Round 4 => Topic started by: TheCrazyMango on November 17, 2010, 10:45:47 pm
-
first off, i would like to thank the haxxor shields.
5uk 5uk 5uk 5uk 5uk 5uk 5uk 5uk 5uk 5ul 5ul 5ul 5ul 5ul 5um 5um 5um 5um 5um 5um 5uo 5uo 5uo 5up 5up 5up 5uq 5uq 5us 5us
its my "annoying haxxor monodark.
game 1. ratchet outrushed me, simple as that
game 2. i had 5 hp and he had 8 creatures. dusk shield blocked all but 1. i win with 2hp
game 3. dusk shield again. i had 3 dragons and ended with 12 hp
ggs ratchet they were really close
-
That 2nd game 3 damage was just BS.... -_- This is why I dont like haxxor shield it screwed us out of a 2-0 win for :life :'(
5bs 5bs 5bs 5bs 5bs 5bu 5bu 5bu 5bu 5bu 5bu 5c0 5c0 5c0 5c0 5c0 5c0 5c2 5c2 5c2 5c2 5c2 5c2 5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5de
gg 927
-
game 2. i had 5 hp and he had 8 creatures. dusk shield blocked all but 1. i win with 2hp
Wow... that's just messed up. Blocking 7/8 is pretty sick.
-
game 2. i had 5 hp and he had 8 creatures. dusk shield blocked all but 1. i win with 2hp
Wow... that's just messed up. Blocking 7/8 is pretty sick.
yea it was messed up. it was also the third different dusk that i played. i guess third times the charm....
-
That is absurd. O-o 7/8 attacks blocked? :o
Sorry about that ratchet, but Darkness needed this win. :) Good games, and fantastic playing 927!
-
That is absurd. O-o 7/8 attacks blocked? :o
Sorry about that ratchet, but Darkness needed this win. :) Good games, and fantastic playing 927!
Right..... -_-... :))
-
And Earth complains about the RNG...
-
clearly rng wants life to lose.
Whatevs Life is completely unlucky this round.
-
Yay! it looks like we have a RNG-hate-list buddy!
-
but ratchet, remember how bad my dusk was until then?? i was blocking like 1 or 2 out of 8 for most of the round
-
but ratchet, remember how bad my dusk was until then?? i was blocking like 1 or 2 out of 8 for most of the round
Im not the one hating but the shield is kind of annoying.
-
Regardless of any improbabilities which occurred here, :darkness won fair and square; congratulations are in order to both them and 9270984. Good try Ratchet, it's unfortunate but these situations are to be expected.
-
Regardless of any improbabilities which occurred here, :darkness won fair and square; congratulations are in order to both them and 9270984. Good try Ratchet, it's unfortunate but these situations are to be expected.
thank yoou willing3. ratchets deck was a good deck, and it was really close for the last two games
-
I am not trying to take away from your win.
Obviously the decks were evenly matched as you played 3 times.
Whether it was luck or whether your deck was indeed better, you guys won.
It just hurts so much more when Life has been losing a lot and we have all these close losses.
-
I am not trying to take away from your win.
Obviously the decks were evenly matched as you played 3 times.
Whether it was luck or whether your deck was indeed better, you guys won.
It just hurts so much more when Life has been losing a lot and we have all these close losses.
I can understand the sentiment. It's one thing when you have no chance, but when you get so close it's painful.
-
Yeeeep and those games were fun and aggrivating but mostly fun. And yet are decks were both monos. ;D
-
Regardless of any improbabilities which occurred here, :darkness won fair and square; congratulations are in order to both them and 9270984. Good try Ratchet, it's unfortunate but these situations are to be expected.
longcat is long
good sportsmanship is good
-
Just a conjecture, but is this a case where adrenaline is better than more creatures in a mono life deck? Wondering if more attacks helps with haxxor shield problem.
On a different note, good to see monodecks are still being played. I barely remembered what they looked like at this point in the War.
-
Just a conjecture, but is this a case where adrenaline is better than more creatures in a mono life deck? Wondering if more attacks helps with haxxor shield problem.
On a different note, good to see monodecks are still being played. I barely remembered what they looked like at this point in the War.
nay
i believe they didnt go with adrenaline approach due to our own counter to adrenaline in R1 - :darkness vs :life
we lost the match but it left quite a mark
credit for this deck goes to our rookie, we let him decide what he wanted to play and we, as team help him tweak the deck to meet PvP standard
looking back, the only time he lost a match with a deck not by his choice was last round using a deck i suggested (oopsie! :s)
-
Just a conjecture, but is this a case where adrenaline is better than more creatures in a mono life deck? Wondering if more attacks helps with haxxor shield problem.
On a different note, good to see monodecks are still being played. I barely remembered what they looked like at this point in the War.
nay
i believe they didnt go with adrenaline approach due to our own counter to adrenaline in R1 - :darkness vs :life
we lost the match but it left quite a mark
credit for this deck goes to our rookie, we let him decide what he wanted to play and we, as team help him tweak the deck to meet PvP standard
looking back, the only time he lost a match with a deck not by his choice was last round using a deck i suggested (oopsie! :s)
[/quote
kobis mrblonde himself said that my deck would win 8 out of 10 times against his deck. your deck was really good though i just didnt draw enough pends.
-
kobis mrblonde himself said that my deck would win 8 out of 10 times against his deck. your deck was really good though i just didnt draw enough pends.
Agreed. Kobi's deck should have beat mine. And i think i said 7 out of 10 (not that it really matters).