Xinef (time) vs. UsernameLife (darkness) 2-1

[Xinef]

Code: [Select]

4vc 5rg 5rg 5rg 5rg 5rg 5rg 5rg 5rg 5rm 5rm 5rm 5rm 5rm 5ro 5ro 5ul 5um 5um 5um 5um 5um 5um 5up 7q0 7q0 7q0 7q0 7q3 7q3
A short summary (excluding the disconnects)

1. I managed to play all devourers quite early and it seems he did not draw enough permanent control or creature control to stop me. Even though he stole my eternity, I still managed to beat him with a number of dragons.

1-0

2. This time he kept killing my devourers with drain lifes and rage potions. He also had ample permanent control.

1-1

3. He kept rage potions to kill my dragons but my devourers completely shut his production so he was unable to play his darkness cards, while I was able to rewind any of his vampires he did manage to play. On the other hand he was beating me with a vampire dagger while healing back any damage from eternity. Eventually he run out of CC and I managed to keep 2 dragons (blocked by stolen turtle shield) and I stole his dagger (though I still had less cards than him, and I was close to decking out).

2-1




The amethyst pillar is here because the 2 most suicidal of our decks already were at 50% time so I had to place it in some of the better decks... but the truth is, it's a hero amethyst pillar with great battle experience.... and it would be useful if darkness used any devourers against me.

And a few screenshots to show that even against a deck with deflags+steals time can still win with permanents remaining
(the second one is a desync)
(http://imageplay.net/view/m7Gbd70744/UsernameLife1) (http://imageplay.net/view/m7Gbd70745/UsernameLife2) (http://imageplay.net/view/m7Gbd70746/UsernameLife3)

[Troh]

i so fucking find it unfair...

at 1:1

UsernameLife had big advantage (killes 3 dragons , and was in full control ).. and it was a desync.

Second Desync it was a great draw for UsernameLife.

It;s so unfair....... i really hate this.. and i am not agree at all with the result of the battle...

USernameLife would beat Xinef' deck 8 times from 10.

but it seems Xinef is desyncted all this times and he is on only when he is at those 2 games..

I find it very very unfair and i am pretty angry about this

[Troh]

and here is the deck :

Code: [Select]

5f0 5f0 5f0 5f0 5f0 5f6 5f6 5fb 5fb 5fb 5fb 5fb 5uk 5uk 5uk 5uk 5uk 5ul 5ul 5ul 5up 5uq 5ur 5us 5ut 5ut 5ut 5ut 5uu 5uu
Zanzarino must focus on desync problems( to find a solution (replaying fromt he momemnt it desyncted or smth like this ) cos it's fucking killing the war and pvp events. and my nerves too

[Kuroaitou]

Interesting battle...

Troh, trust me - I know how you feel. Guess how many times crucial battles were lost because of desyncs? In either way, I'd say that these decks have a good chance of fighting each other, especially since Xinef's could use upgraded cards.

[Xinef]

Troh, please stay calm, this battle might have been very exciting but it's no reason to be aggressive. It seems your deck was quite a good counter, but I'm not sure if it would win 8 out of 10 battles. Maybe, but I really don't know.

Anyway, Time needed a victory, or else we'd be out this round, so let us celebrate this victory, rather than ranting about how unfair it was in your opinion.

[Troh]

Troh, please stay calm, this battle might have been very exciting but it's no reason to be aggressive. It seems your deck was quite a good counter, but I'm not sure if it would win 8 out of 10 battles. Maybe, but I really don't know.

Anyway, Time needed a victory, or else we'd be out this round, so let us celebrate this victory, rather than ranting about how unfair it was in your opinion.

deck counters everything from your deck.

it hurts me this way cos , i designed this deck and i knew you would use devonian dragons that are so dead with rage potions, and explosions for eterneties.

[Xinef]

deck counters everything from your deck.

You don't have a good counter against devourers (you can kill them, but then you can't kill all the dragons). You have only 3 permanent destruction cards (I have 4 permanents + steal, so theoretically 5 permanents), you have roughly the same amount of CC cards as I have damaging cards, so it seems like an equal battle. Yes, you can counter anything I play, but only with a good draw against a bad draw. Otherwise statistically I should be able to play more than you destroy.

In other words the fact you can counter every aspect of my deck does not mean you will always counter it. In fact statistically you'd probably often be able to counter eg. creatures while lacking permanent destruction, or the opposite.

[Troh]

deck counters everything from your deck.

You don't have a good counter against devourers (you can kill them, but then you can't kill all the dragons). You have only 3 permanent destruction cards (I have 4 permanents + steal, so theoretically 5 permanents), you have roughly the same amount of CC cards as I have damaging cards, so it seems like an equal battle. Yes, you can counter anything I play, but only with a good draw against a bad draw. Otherwise statistically I should be able to play more than you destroy.

In other words the fact you can counter every aspect of my deck does not mean you will always counter it. In fact statistically you'd probably often be able to counter eg. creatures while lacking permanent destruction, or the opposite.

Xinef at 1:1, he raged 3 of your dragons ( that were hiting only once) .. there was a gg... but of course... desync

[miniwally]

Well Troh you need to prove he couldn't win with the other 3 dragons out and I don't think it's worthwhile it's not that serious and I'm sure the desyncs were genuine.

[Troh]

miniwally yes you are right,
btw Xinef gg.. it's just hurting me to loose my babies

[Xinef]

miniwally yes you are right,
btw Xinef gg.. it's just hurting me to loose my babies

Don't worry, I'll take good care of 'em... unless my opponent in the next round uses the fact we're left with a single deck against me.... let's hope not.