Hover over cards for details, click for permalink
4t9 4vk 4vk 4vn 4vp 4vp 4vp 4vp 4vp 4vp 50u 50u 50u 50u 50u 50u 50u 50u 50u 50u 50u 50u 50u 50u 50u 50u 50u 50u 5li 5li 5li 5li 5m6 5m6 5m6 5m6 5m6 5m6 6u7 6u7 6u7 6u7 6u7 8pqIt was really a fun experience. If it is a 0-3 against a sopa I say, hey, got countered. But this was HELL, and I don't wish the same feels for you.
- g1 nice panda rng (PU on big creature, win by dmg);
- g2 possible Insig misplay, but we had 220 hps;
- g3 I had 2 SoDs all game, thx a lot, losing to exact dmg in last turn (maybe if I play that AM one turn later, but I was quite pressed,
I was calculating his dmg every turn, and it seemed just fine, not getting sod ruined everything - troll rng gave me the 2nd just after
playing miracle and not having any quanta...), oh yeah, and having like all ppms drawn...;
- g4-5 www handpicked every card, while me having 2 pend starts (was worse in g5, had to throw out several cards).
Reverse sweep always sucks, even if you were lucky early games, but to me that wasn't the most annoying and infuriating.
Originally Insig and DoctorC was playing, but after g2 Insig's parents were strict, it is too late, so game over. Match was rescheduled for
today gmt 3:00, 3 hours after deadline. I politely asked ian if we could have that matchup with the original players, since DocC was playing
well, enjoyed playing, and wanted to have him the opportunity of success. In all my life I never liked the "we don't want to create a precedent"
argument. Because that was his answer. Just a few days ago I had a "we judge situations case by case basis" answer, and this really makes
me wonder doesn't these two collide... Personally I don't think that a 3 hours delay affects the War ("oh, I will have only 93 hours for deckbuilding
against
and
!"). But I DO think that the pairings matter, who plays against who. Everybody has a different playstyle.
Other than that your deck is really good, and really War 13,
.
ggs
