(Life Lieutenant) Solaris 3 - 0 Naesala (sub) (Gravity Salvager)

[Solaris]

Hover over cards for details, click for permalink

Deck import code : [Select]

5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 61q 61q 61q 61q 7ae 7ae 7ae 7ae 7ae 7ae 80a 80a 80i 80i 80i 80i 8pu

Call me the king of Frogtal, baby. ggs!

[worldwideweb3]

Hover over cards for details, click for permalink

Deck import code : [Select]

55k 55k 55k 55k 55k 55k 55p 55t 55t 55t 562 56i 56i 56i 56i 56i 576 576 576 576 576 576 576 74b 74b 74b 74b 74b 74b 74i 74i 8pl

[Physsion]

Format your match topic titles correctly, or penalties will be given. The opponent's team was not included in the original title.

[Basman-1453]

Format your match topic titles correctly, or penalties will be given. The opponent's team was not included in the original title.

* Basman-1453 fails to understand how did web omitted Gravity on the reply thread -_-;

[Solaris]

Format your match topic titles correctly, or penalties will be given. The opponent's team was not included in the original title.

* Basman-1453 fails to understand how did web omitted Gravity on the reply thread -_-;

I forgot it first, Physs changed it.

[Ginyu]

If you edit the title afterwards, it will not edit the replies.

Good old times when Gravity won this match-up!
http://elementscommunity.org/forum/round-1-166/%28gravity-sld-%29-inthisroom-3-1-dawn_to_dusk-%28life-gen-%29/

[Basman-1453]

Format your match topic titles correctly, or penalties will be given. The opponent's team was not included in the original title.

* Basman-1453 fails to understand how did web omitted Gravity on the reply thread -_-;

I forgot it first, Physs changed it.

Aah, that explains ><

[Solaris]

If you edit the title afterwards, it will not edit the replies.

Good old times when Gravity won this match-up!
http://elementscommunity.org/forum/round-1-166/%28gravity-sld-%29-inthisroom-3-1-dawn_to_dusk-%28life-gen-%29/

I wonder if 6 Lightning made the difference....

[vagman13]

I REALLY really did not want to make a big deal out of this. I really really want this event to play out flawlessly.I REALLY REALLY understand the  hard work WMs put for free in their spare time,for us , to have an enjoyable time out of this and future events.And I DO appreciate this.VERY much.

However , and I am in no way going to push this any forward, I find it unacceptable ,for WMs to threaten a war team,with card penalty, for a wrong forum thread title for battle results.Players are people,and this is something that is out of the game,out of the competition,that was made in a hurry.And the devills advocate kicks in,while WMs themselves make "minor" errors such as greenlighting illegal decks.As I said in chat ,I thought that the rulling in that particular situation was the best for the 2 teams involved,for the rest of teams no so so.Also in the recent past I had my obligations about some Wm rulings,but who's to me to judge.


To sum it up,the same level of expectations that is desired from the players,has to be required from the organisers.

[majofa]

I don't think the WMs warning was as bad as it seems. It's in the rules how to post, and yes, mistakes happen. However, think of this more as a heavy-handed reminder to post correctly. 

[Solaris]

I don't think the WMs warning was as bad as it seems. It's in the rules how to post, and yes, mistakes happen. However, think of this more as a heavy-handed reminder to post correctly. 

I'm just going to purposely screw it up now. Down with the system.

[vagman13]

I don't think the WMs warning was as bad as it seems. It's in the rules how to post, and yes, mistakes happen. However, think of this more as a heavy-handed reminder to post correctly. 

I'm just going to purposely screw it up now. Down with the system.

Hey penalties

On a more a serious note,yeah now a warning has been given and players as said in the rules and should record their matches properly.

Perhaps, other people should do their stuff properly also?