(Light Sc) Pineapple 3 - (Life L) killsdazombies 0

[Pineapple]

Hover over cards for details, click for permalink

Deck import code : [Select]

55s 55s 55s 55s 5l8 5l8 5l8 5l8 5l8 5l8 5l8 5l8 5l8 5l8 5lf 5lf 5lf 5ll 5ll 5ll 5ll 5ll 5ll 5mq 5mq 5mq 5mq 5mq 7n2 7n2 8pl

To be honest, I didn't expect much with this slow CC-less deck, but I think I've seen the Light. ^^

Round 1: Won coin-toss. Subsequently outrushed him by a turn.
Round 2: Won coin-toss. Subsequently outrushed him by a turn.
Round 3: Lost coin toss. Kdz had a single-tower start, and by the end of the 8-turn match, he had only gathered 11 and 9 .

[killsdazombies]

Hover over cards for details, click for permalink

Deck import code : [Select]

5bs 5bs 5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5bt 5bt 5bt 5bt 5bt 61r 61r 61r 61r 61r 61t 61t 61t 61t 61t 624 624 624 7ac 7ac 7bu 7bu 7bu 8pu

 OP pretty much explains it all....


Killsdazombies
Wins: 692
Winrate: 69.2 %
Average TTW: 10.966763005780347
EMs: 2
EM rate: 0.28901734104046245 %

Pineapple
Wins: 308
Winrate: 30.8 %
Average TTW: 10.672077922077921
EMs: 82
EM rate: 26.623376623376622 %


Seems legit

[xdude]

Hover over cards for details, click for permalink

Deck import code : [Select]

5bs 5bs 5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5bt 5bt 5bt 5bt 5bt 61r 61r 61r 61r 61r 61t 61t 61t 61t 61t 624 624 624 7ac 7ac 7bu 7bu 7bu 8pu

 OP pretty much explains it all....


Killsdazombies
Wins: 692
Winrate: 69.2 %
Average TTW: 10.966763005780347
EMs: 2
EM rate: 0.28901734104046245 %

Pineapple
Wins: 308
Winrate: 30.8 %
Average TTW: 10.672077922077921
EMs: 82
EM rate: 26.623376623376622 %


Seems legit

Sorry, but I really have a problem with these kind of posts. Blaming luck and such for your losses is very disgraceful - our team lost 5 full games on this one and you will never see one complaint about luck and I can guarantee you you will never see one.

Also, I call bs on the stats.

I got:

Pine
Wins: 651
Winrate: 65.1 %
Average TTW: 8.626728110599078
EMs: 22
EM rate: 3.3794162826420893 %

kdz
Wins: 349
Winrate: 34.9 %
Average TTW: 8.59025787965616
EMs: 0
EM rate: 0 %

I am not calling you a liar or saying you made those up. However, as you can see:

• 100 games is a lot, but not really. The ttw's are over 2 turns lower here and the win rates are inversed.
• The AI is bad. It will Bless over using Endow, it will fly weapons costing important quanta and it will bless rather than play another crusader the following turn. Also, it will probably play Dim Shields over PU's, even against a field full of momentum'd creatures.
• ...do you really think a Dim Shield deck should be favored against a Momentum-based deck?

[killsdazombies]

I never said it was luck based, I ran the stats after Pineapple mentioned it, and i found it funny. I'm sorry if you took offense to it, as it was not intended that way, as i was just poking fun at myself, and Pineapple.

[Sevs]

PU dragons is still a quick deck. seems like it was a pretty even matchup

[Pineapple]

What I find is the most hilarious part about the stats is that the deck with lower TTW had higher win-rate, even when the decks themselves have no CC to slow the other deck down

[Anthraxx]

Simulator? Really? Maybe if it was mono fire, but with these decks?

[bogtro]

Sim will obviously fail with both these decks. Probably a closer matchup than the 3-0 would imply, but yeah a dim shield deck<momentus crusader in general.

[Higurashi]

Aight, I've got an order for 2 Lobos. Who can sign this for me?

[killsdazombies]

*Signs quickly*

Kthanksbye.

[willng3]

Heh so much Momentum.  Still having Nightmares of Gravity Shields, xdude? :P

[Newbiecake]

Great job Pine! We really needed this win. ^.^