IANAWM, but having to go -3 upgrades -mark & at least half deck as pillars makes the choice not seem so strong, & mostly says something about Light's poor elemental strength to market price ratio. But since the market price ratio is because other elements make plenty use of Light's good cards, yet Light has traditionally had diversity issues with those same cards, this deck ends up being a meta play that is related to Light, whereby Light is seeking to exploit the interaction of Psiontal with conventional counters to Light's predictable deck pool
tl;dr Light's non-Light deck is a symptom of their conventional deckpool & this war's market letting them down. Which is relevant to Light
Very good observation, completely spot on ! If you looked at the point standing after auction, light was in a decent spot (in the middle), but after shopping, looking at card count before round 1, we were next to last with only a couple of cards ahead of
, and it is well known how strong
is in the war meta. So it definitely demonstrates how much
is hurt by the market prices. On the other hand,
went up to 1st place even though from the decks you can see they packed a lot of their OP shard, so that element (traditionally also weak in war meta) was clearly strengthened a lot, while
possibly one of the weakest elements in war meta got punished even more.