It's not an infinite amount of time though, I'm not sure on the specifics but I think they say life formed about 5 billion years ago or something, and that amount of time matched with the odds of the right chemicals coming together and forming the right proteins and such to make a life form just doesn't work for me. Sorry if the time is dead wrong, I don't feel a need pay attention to those in school.
It's quite likely that there was a universe before this one. An infinite number of universes over an infinite amount of time, really. In order for the amount of time to be finite, not only this has to be the only universe to ever exist, but its creation must have been a finite amount of time ago. The latter is pretty much confirmed by science, but the former is the problem. If there has only ever been one universe, and it has a finite lifespan, then there was an infinite amount of time before its creation. Why would it take an infinite amount of time for a universe to be created? How can something that is possible only happen once over an infinite amount of time?
Basically, why would God wait an infinite amount of time in order to create the universe? And then, after an infinite period of thought, why would he suddenly change his mind and decide he wanted to create a universe? This is what doesn't make sense.
The more likely explanation is that universes can be created out of emptiness. Keep in mind that the law of conservation of matter, the "nothing can't create something" rule, has only been proven to apply to our universe. There is neither evidence for nor against the idea that emptiness can create matter. However, the logical conclusion, based on the argument mentioned above, is that it can.
But if you want to believe that God created the Universe but never again interfered with it and doesn't perform miracles or condemn people he doesn't like, then I have nothing against that. My main targets are Christianity and Islam.
Also, I don't intend to come off as rude or condescending. Not towards you, at least. The reason I'm responding to your posts is that they're quality posts, they just disagree with my beliefs. If they were worthless posts, or if your thoughts had blatant logical flaws, I wouldn't bother responding.