I once spoke to a girl who tried to disprove my religion. I in turn disproved hers. She was heartbroken. (It's a long dramatic story involving a fight with her parents and yadda yadda yadda). I explained to her the difficulties I had in believing in any sort of organized religion. These difficulties were exacerbated by my superstitious nature. While I did not believe in organized religion, I did believe in both a god and karma.
While this argument turned debate turned pep-talk went on, I stumbled across the beliefs I had always had, said in concise and logical terms.
God does not care what religion you practice. Simply do the right thing, and the right thing, and if there is a god, he/she will respond in kind.
As long as you are moral, it is okay not to know. As long as you are just, it is okay not to believe.
I agree mostly with what you say but there is a conflict as to what morality is. Although it seems easy in extreme situations to determine what is moral, when the line begins to blur there becomes a plethora of options--as there is a variety of moral theories, each encasing the answer in different ways.
I mean to approach this in such a manner that the answer is universal-istic. Which means there is a right answer and there is only one. Meaning that if two people have an argument on the same ethical dilemma and end up with different answers--there is one person that is wrong.
One of the most unsettling universal ethical theories that I have encountered is Ethical Egoism. Ethical Egoism can be summerized to doing what is one's own best rational interestAlthough the person is being 'ethical' there is a lot of virtues missing.
No one person stands by only one ethical theory--or rather it is difficult to. This is not admitting to a relativistic belief of morals but rather a descriptive observation.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
As for the religion choices, I do not particularly like any religion so to say. I like the underlying philosophy that some religions are based upon. Buddhism at its core is not a religion but rather a way of thinking--there is no direct ties to worship or diety worship. The same can be said with the Tao (Dao) beliefs alongside Confucianism.
The above mentioned "religions" are where my interests lie: Tao, Confucianism, Buddhism and Zen. I also like the thoughts of may other philosophers in terms of ethical decisions. I am a virtue ethicist and like the ideas mentioned by Eastern philosophy and habitualization of ethics.
I do not disregard the other worldly religions, but I much rather prefer the philosophy. Religions have a way of being diluted especially in language translations and a lot of misconceptions due to cultural differences. I simply plead agnostic words when it comes to most religions--I believe there is no way in knowing if they are 'true'. I guess that is why they call it "faith". Unfortiantely I am skeptical.