Does that mean science is a religion too and that you shouldn't believe it because science can't even prove science? Meaning, you can't prove the scientific method with science, we just assume it to be true. And assuming science to be true, that is a proven fact.
How do you "prove" the scientific method? The scientific method is a process, not a belief. Comparing the scientific method to religion is like comparing a verb to a noun. Your argument makes no sense.
If science isn't proven, then nothing is. Science proves itself because it always works, and if a single part of our knowledge of science does not work, then it is obviously incorrect, and there is a correct law of science that will be discovered. Science is not a system of beliefs; it is a method used to obtain knowledge of the world that we live in.
On the other hand, religion is a large composition of stories passed down over thousands of years that people allow to govern their daily lives. It is not entirely true at all.
For instance, Christianity once believed that the Earth was the center of the universe and that everything, including the Sun, rotated around it. That was proven false.
Christianity states that God made all aquatic life on the sixth day, then
all land life (save land plants, which were created on the fourth day) on the seventh day. *cough* dinosaurs *cough*. Also in the story of creation, it is said that God created
day and night, then made
the Sun three
days later. Most scientists believe that the Earth is about 4.6 billion years old, which conflicts with the story of creation also. I am not even going to bring up evolution; that would take forever.
Religion is the old explanation of the universe, just as ancient mythology was before it. Today's science is the new explanation.
