Alright, evolutionists. Here's the little bit where you realize that you're wrong.
You would agree that matter cannot come from nowhere because you don't believe in any supernatural forces. Well then, you say there was a big bang that created everything in time. To have a big bang, you need something to go bang, correct? Well, well did that come from?
I realize that something has to be created from nothing, either a universe or a god. However, which is more likely: the creation of a universe from nothing (which is possible given an eternity) or the creation of supernatural life from nothing (aka god)? Of course the creation of a universe. Why? Because it is nonliving. While a basic organism can rise from inorganic material by sheer luck (of course, you have billions of years for this to happen), I do not see how a complex being with DNA and somehow the power to distort the rules of the universe can be created from nothing.
Salt grows in the oceans every day. If the earth was millions of years old, we could basically walk across the ocean because of all the salt. No joke.
Salt can be formed by sodium and chloride, and can be broken down into sodium and chloride. Assuming you are talking about NaCl.
And so, you are wrong. You can't argue with that logic.
You are jumping to a conclusion. No one is 100% sure about how the universe, humans, etc. were created. I believe it is unlikely but possible that a magic little fairy named God went "poof" and created the universe.
