And then they realize nothing Kurohami says makes any sense. Seriously, what are you saying?
Since we have no evidence of the existence of god until now
If that's true and the evidence is irrefutable, looks like I win.
how does those religious groups able to make such detailed books about gods and creation of the world such as the Bible?
Pen and paper.
It is without a doubt that those religious text originates from our own imaginations.
Without a doubt you say? Hmmm.... then why do so many people not doubt them? It seems to me that if something is without a doubt, everyone and their mother would see it the same way.
So, if there is a god, we haven't had any conscious encounter with him/her
But in religious texts, people have had plenty of encounters with gods. And you haven't really proven that religious texts are false, so they might be true.
so the religions and the belief of the religious groups are most likely false, acting on those beliefs is foolish.
It seems to me that calling others foolish for what they believe based on what you believe is actually what's foolish.
Your arguments quite contradict themselves if you know what I mean. I can't understand your stand on the matter after reading the entire post, so are you implying that gods exist, and people have had many encounters with them to write a accurate records? You said they wrote Bible with pen and paper, that might be true, but then the original Bible might be written on parchments in stead of paper. Even assuming you are right, most fantasy novels are also written with pen and paper first, that doesn't make them reliable records of the truth. I said it's without a doubt that the religious text originates from people's imagination, and you asked "why are there so many people not doubt them?" That's because they never thought about how the writer of the religious text get their ideas, they just believe it because they want to, not because they actually think some gods told the writer what to write. You said that there are records of actual encounters with Gods in religious text, and they have not yet been proven false. But then, you can't prove any fantasy story false because we don't know everything in the world, and so we can't prove something we don't know don't exist. And, do you have evidence that any of those "recorded encounters with gods" did actually happen then? If you don't, then your idea is not in any way more supported than mine. You said "calling others foolish for what they believe based on what you believe is actually what's foolish", that is not what I said, I didn't call people foolish for what they believe, I said "acting" on something you believe without evidence that it's right is foolish. Do you still remember the genocide in Rwanda? The Hutu people killed hundreds of thousands of Tutsi people based on their belief that the size of their nose make them superior. Was that not foolish? If they believe the size of one's nose makes one superior, it's fine, maybe it's even true in some ways, but they acted on these beliefs without any real evidence supporting it. There were many other such examples through out the history of mankind. If you think they weren't foolish, then you just like them. No offence meant, just proving my point.
