Really, a Pulverizer which can destroy every defense your opponent has is overestimated! You probably used it unupped, because - assuming you can play - the upped one doesn't eat all your gravity-quanta. No, this deck is really unbalanced. My average rate is somewhere around 74% with the deck hidden in the spoiler:
52n 592 5c6 5ro 5rp 5rp 5rp 5up 621 621 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6rn 6rn 6rn 6u3 6u3 6u3 6u6 71b 74b 74b 77f 7do 7do 7gp 7n3 7q5 7q5 7q5 7q7The Anubis allows me to quint all my creatures. Most importantly, mutants with cool skills like destroy or steal. 2 Firestorms even take Firemakers down and all creatures by Ferox except the dragons in one big punch (right, what do you do about them with this deck?). With 40 cards I am likely drawing the cards I need than you do. In your deck, the Bonewall seems to be really unnecessary. And I bet you have not won a single match against Osiris yet.
i dont lose to osiris unless the stars align to spite me 9-1 so far, dont recall how the loss happened
pulverizer does not destroy "every defense". it destroys specific defenses if not stolen/exploded/destroyed, the target is not immune, and if quantum is available. no one is saying its not fun to smash the FG into a permanent-less pulp. the question is if its necessary. i say no, that its either a huge risk to be stolen, or potentially using the only protect artifact to function. in every situation that pulvy is useful, another card is more useful, less risky, and not fighting eternity for a weapon spot. in a majority of situations the lone pulvy will not be available, not be useful (miracle early game/ferox/chaos lord/dark matter, or protected stuff like Seism/Obliterator/Hermes), or be starved for quantum
there are lots of ways to solve problems the FGs throw at you. i find pulvy to be less effective than other ways. for those rare times you draw your single pulvy and single protect artifact immediately along with a perfect quantum assortment and proceeded to smash a hapless Rainbow/Octane...i never get consistently specifically lucky like that. i have to rely on potentially not seeing any 1-in-a-deck card until at least halfway through, if not never (due to eternity)
i will test your 74%. very interested, as it looks very similar to Can Haz Moar Draws, except slightly unupped, with supernovas, and with feral bond for a specific method of EM. 3 shards? thats not normal, gotta see it in action. with a 74% win, you should be swimming in
, what reason to not upgrade them...hmm. your deck smacks of "win more" concepts that dont allow such a high win %
im happy to explain my deck reasoning and experience. ill debate the merits of cards all day (thats what game forums are for
)
but please dont link unrelated decks that arent based on this one. you have a poison FG farmer thats 100% win? thats great, but doesnt belong here. this is the exact reason i moved from PuppyChows deck thread, its not appropriate to hijack a thread like that
