The Verity_blues, Rainbow Half Blood Killer

[verity_blues]

Hover over cards for details, click for permalink

Deck import code : [Select]

52n 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6qq 6u3 6u3 6u6 71b 71b 74b 74b 74b 74f 77f 77g 7am 7am 7ba 7dq 7dq 7gr 7jv 7jv 7n3 7q5 7q5 7t9 7t9 7t9 80d 80d 8pj

Its a fun deck to play. The basics is that I use every element, not to much of any. I find that all of the half bloods really need their fe quantum towers, pulverize those and their creatures often can't use their abilities. Once this deck gets rolling, elemental masteries are common. I win at least 90%, but haven't done the real math.

[PuppyChow]

I highly doubt it's 90%. Simply because not even Jmizzle's had that BEFORE the dial nerf.
(EDIT: Half-Bloods, not FGs... Someone move this topic)

And there's a few cards I think are rather pointless:
-Graboid
-Black Hole
-(?) Blessings (thinking about it, they could be useful for an oty)
-Arctic Octopus (overall costly; maybe permafrost shield instead?)
-Novas (you aren't entropy mark and they're only really useful early game unless you have a low tower count)
-Feral Bonds (you only have TWO mass creature generators, so they aren't likely to do you much good until endgame)
-Lava Destroyers (no fire storm? >_>...)

[sSethia]

Where's the rain of fire?

Also, the novas look lonely in there. I usually only use them when I'm entropy mark. I always take 6 or none.

Nice deck, 90% is awesome!

[BluePriest]

Where's the rain of fire?

Also, the novas look lonely in there. I usually only use them when I'm entropy mark. I always take 6 or none.

Nice deck, 90% is awesome!

Theres probably not 6 because he doesnt have an entropy mark. He is still using the towers as his main source of quanta, however, the supernovas splashed in there are good for when you just need certain quanta the towers just arent giving you. It gets rid of some of the luck of quantum towers.

What would happen i he had 6 in there is this.
1)First hand, have about 2, and about 2 towers. Wont be able to play the supernovas too soon usually.
2)By the time he can play the supernovas, he has 4 in his hand, and really only needs the 1 for a little boost. '

Ive tried having a deck that uses quantum towers and Supernovas as the main source of quanta, I always have too much though. If I just have 2 supernovas, then it makes the battle mroe reliable, AND I still have plenty of quanta to fuel my abilities as long as the battle takes.

[DietSnapple135]

I highly doubt it's 90%. Simply because not even Jmizzle's had that BEFORE the dial nerf.
(EDIT: Half-Bloods, not FGs... Someone move this topic)

And there's a few cards I think are rather pointless:
-Graboid
-Black Hole
-(?) Blessings (thinking about it, they could be useful for an oty)
-Arctic Octopus (overall costly; maybe permafrost shield instead?)
-Novas (you aren't entropy mark and they're only really useful early game unless you have a low tower count)
-Feral Bonds (you only have TWO mass creature generators, so they aren't likely to do you much good until endgame)
-Lava Destroyers (no fire storm? >_>...)

I definitely agree how a lot of these cards don't seem particularly optimal, but looking at the deck, it does look like a fun deck to play that is fairly reliable. Maybe some of the cards he included are there to speed the game up and making it a little less tedious? I know, for me, sacrificing some win % for speed and fun is worth it. Especially if it's a grindfest like AI3 and AI5.

[BluePriest]

I highly doubt it's 90%. Simply because not even Jmizzle's had that BEFORE the dial nerf.
(EDIT: Half-Bloods, not FGs... Someone move this topic)

And there's a few cards I think are rather pointless:
-Graboid
-Black Hole
-(?) Blessings (thinking about it, they could be useful for an oty)
-Arctic Octopus (overall costly; maybe permafrost shield instead?)
-Novas (you aren't entropy mark and they're only really useful early game unless you have a low tower count)
-Feral Bonds (you only have TWO mass creature generators, so they aren't likely to do you much good until endgame)
-Lava Destroyers (no fire storm? >_>...)

I definitely agree how a lot of these cards don't seem particularly optimal, but looking at the deck, it does look like a fun deck to play that is fairly reliable. Maybe some of the cards he included are there to speed the game up and making it a little less tedious? I know, for me, sacrificing some win % for speed and fun is worth it. Especially if it's a grindfest like AI3 and AI5.

The thing I like about this deck is that he isnt neccessarily using the optimal cards. He is just using carsds that he thinks are fun instead of just making a grinding deck. Sure you could put in different cards for the one he has, but we dont want to stifle the creativity of deck building do we? I know thats what no one had in mind, im just sayin. Its a nice turn from the classic rainbow imo