The blessed and the unstoppable (I'm really bad at coming up with names)

[crayons932]

Hover over cards for details, click for permalink

Deck import code : [Select]

6ts 6ts 6u3 6u3 6u3 6u3 6u3 6u3 71e 71e 71e 71e 71e 71e 74a 74a 74a 74a 74a 74a 7jv 7jv 7jv 7jv 7jv 7jv 809 809 809 809 809 809 8pj

Pretty simple: boost the lightening and the the deathstalkers for damage. Unstoppable works best on the deathstalkers, and blessing works best on lightening. The only frustrating thing is the discard after the first draw (I usually end up playing a lightening), which is why I put two pillars in there. No cc or pc, so it's got to be a quick deck. It's worked pretty well for me overall. Thoughts?

[Cheesy111]

Make it smaller, and use CPs when you're using a lot of entropy.  My suggestion:

-6 Blessing, -1 Ball Lightning, -1 Deathstalker, -1 Unstoppable, +5 Chaos Power, -2 Amethyst Tower, +4 Death Pendulums.

[Chapuz]

And no dunes?

[Cheesy111]

And no dunes?

Dunes would completely change the deck.  I am not comfortable with suggesting such a major change.

[Chapuz]

And no dunes?

Dunes would completely change the deck.  I am not comfortable with suggesting such a major change.

Joking, right? just replace 2-3 scorps/BL for dunes

[Cheesy111]

And no dunes?

Dunes would completely change the deck.  I am not comfortable with suggesting such a major change.

Joking, right? just replace 2-3 scorps for dunes

No, not joking.  A deck with Dunes is different than a deck with deathstalkers.  Dunes are also more synergistic with sundial, RT, Eternity, etc. and this deck lacks those.  Therefore I would not put dunes in.

[whatifidogetcaught?]

His point is that since you are using supernovas, you can use Dunes for time without affecting the deck in a negative light, but in fact positively I believe.

[Cheesy111]

His point is that since you are using supernovas, you can use Dunes for time without affecting the deck in a negative light, but in fact positively I believe.

It's not about affecting the deck positively. I am not comfortable with suggesting such a major change. A deck with Dunes is significantly different than a deck with deathstalkers.  Therefore I would not put dunes in, as it would significantly change the deck.

[Chapuz]

His point is that since you are using supernovas, you can use Dunes for time without affecting the deck in a negative light, but in fact positively I believe.

It's not about affecting the deck positively. I am not comfortable with suggesting such a major change. A deck with Dunes is significantly different than a deck with deathstalkers.  Therefore I would not put dunes in, as it would significantly change the deck.

The idea was to balance the quanta

[choongmyoung]

Just 1 dune... Isn't your idea is to bless or unstoppablize creatures so that they can attack or stay alive?
2 or more dune in play will be not that good since its quanta/atk ratio is bad, but 1 dune should be quite nice.
When you play 2 SNs, you'll have 4 quanta and will have to draw another SN to play the deathstalker. But if you use dune, you don't have to.

[TribalTrouble]

And no dunes?

Dunes would completely change the deck.  I am not comfortable with suggesting such a major change.

Joking, right? just replace 2-3 scorps for dunes

No, not joking.  A deck with Dunes is different than a deck with deathstalkers.  Dunes are also more synergistic with sundial, RT, Eternity, etc. and this deck lacks those.  Therefore I would not put dunes in.

Ok you are really ticking me off with these posts here.
1) This isn't your deck, so what if you can't suggest these while feeling comfortable? We can, we will, and we are.
2) Your only reasoning is that this is different. Well, a RoL/Hope deck with -2 Dragons +2 Angels is different. Does anyone argue with it just because it is different? No. Do they think that one is better than the other due to different advantages and disadvantages, well, yeah, but that is more personal opinion so they don't dispute it.
3) This was suggested (a valid suggestion imho) because it is better for the deck, makes it stronger, faster, and increases quanta balance.
4) Why are you so arrogant? Your posts here make me get the impression that you think just because you disagree with it, it is wrong. Well, that path of thinking is wrong.
5) A deck does not have to be completely based around a card that is popularly used to base decks around just to include it in a deck. Sure, it may take advantage of that card's abilities, but a deck can be improved by said card in different ways for different reasons. I don't see why you can't wrap your head around that.

[whatifidogetcaught?]

Ok you are really ticking me off with these posts here.

I just realized that the original poster never even posted again. That makes the argument kind of pointless. Let HIM/HER make up his own mind!

Good point TribalTrouble. Sorry if I contributed.