Supernova-based Speedbow List

[tyranim]

yay, i have one in all but 1 category... (works on pillarless rainbow)

[Thiefboy109]

This thread is too good to let it slip to the 3rd page!
*Bump*

Nice work.

[Tea is good]

Uhh, the fractalbow was kind of a failure, it's barely competitive, if it's not too much trouble, could you take it out?

[jmdt]

This guy may or may not be a pillarless rainbow.

http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,16563.msg226119#msg226119

[willng3]

Uhh, the fractalbow was kind of a failure, it's barely competitive, if it's not too much trouble, could you take it out?

As you wish.

This guy may or may not be a pillarless rainbow.

http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,16563.msg226119#msg226119

It doesn't use Supernova, therefore it doesn't qualify.

[Kuroaitou]

It might be a bit early to say this, but... can you PLEASE sticky this? This list definitely needs to be noticed!

That said, +rep (after I 'share the love' first).

[tyranim]

woohoo! i got one in all sections! (personal accomplishment dance time!)

[willng3]

It might be a bit early to say this, but... can you PLEASE sticky this? This list definitely needs to be noticed!

That said, +rep (after I 'share the love' first).

I'm still contemplating this as we speak.  Here's the issue:  Currently the way each of the Deck sections categorizes decks is that anything where a thread lists multiple decks without one being blatantly listed as an original (non-variant) is considered a compilation and is thereby placed under the Deck Help section.  Reason being that we don't have a specific area for compilations in the Deck board which makes it somewhat more difficult to categorize those types of decks.  However, in the case of duos, trios, etc., there are situations where each deck listed is a duo (trio, etc) and therefore could qualify for that section; the issue is should they?  There really isn't a definitive line set up in this area which is the cause of this entire problem; a problem which I hope is solved very, very soon.

In saying that, however, I have placed this in this section because 1)  Every deck listed here is a Rainbow 2)  It wouldn't make any sense for this to be listed in any section apart from Rainbow decks; odds are that nobody would notice it before they posted a deck here which defeats its purpose (but then again so does not having this topic sticky'd...) 3)  Despite the fact that I've referred to it as a compilation several times, in truth it serves as more of an Index.  The problem, however, is that I could easily make the opposite argument which is my cause for hesitation at the moment.  I guess the real question is if its use demands that it deserves a sticky.

TL;DR - I can't make this decision by myself because I'm too conflicted as it stands.  I'm setting up a poll right now to make that decision; if the results are unquestionably in favor of sticky'ing the topic then I'll do it and worry about moving it later if something changes down the road.

Thanks for the feedback!

[UTAlan]

I think it merits a sticky. People who come to the Rainbow Decks subforum are looking for...rainbow decks. Having an index of them as a sticky makes complete sense.

[willng3]

I was going to let the poll run for a week, but it would appear that there's an overwhelming majority opinion so I don't see any reason to delay it any longer.

Sticky'd.

[vidurkhanna]

 ???
no unupped rainbow decks ?

        

im gonna quit!!! 

[kirchj33]

???
no unupped rainbow decks ?

        

im gonna quit!!! 

Supernova-based pretty much implies upped decks.  Please don't leave.