Supernova-based Speedbow List

[Essence]

You know what, I'm retarded.  I thought LMF had a :timemark

My bad! Please to ignore!  You already rock!  +Rep.

[Rutarete]

So, because i can, i decided to count them. I counted 137 decks (variants included).

[Bhlewos]

Great idea, willng, and thanks for the list! I'll be trying out all of these.

[The_Mormegil]

I think my (only original) deck fits the description. Can you add it or does this require a certain amount of responses?

[willng3]

I think my (only original) deck fits the description. Can you add it or does this require a certain amount of responses?

I'm assuming you're referring to One-Winged Angel.  I added that a couple of days ago.

[The_Mormegil]

I think my (only original) deck fits the description. Can you add it or does this require a certain amount of responses?

I'm assuming you're referring to One-Winged Angel.  I added that a couple of days ago.

:O where? *checks again*

[tyranim]

hey, one of my decks finally made it in one of these types of threads! i feel so honored
derp, 2, not 1

[ralouf]

I create this yesterday :
http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,27853.0.html
maybe it can be here too  ?

[willng3]

I create this yesterday :
http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,27853.0.html
maybe it can be here too  ?

I was going to delay adding it because you seemed open to new suggestions so I didn't want to add a deck prematurely that would have been modified in the meantime.

Also, I was trying to avoid these "Can you add my deck too?" replies because if this keeps going then 80% of this thread is going to be deck requests which was not what I had in mind when I created it.  Therefore I will emphasize this point one last time:

If you have any questions or concerns regarding a deck then I ask that you either contact me in chat or via PM.  This thread is not the place to argue for a deck's addition to be heard.

[willng3]

Kay, I added a few decks here and rearranged the way the PSNbows and Elemental Tower based Speedbows are arranged.  PSNbows are now arranged based on their Deck Marks whose Elements are then arranged the same way as in the bazaar/deck screen in the game known as Elements.  Same goes for the Elemental Tower Speedbows except that obviously applies to the Elements of the Towers instead.  Oh sure I could have done it alphabetically, but it's about 4000000x more epic this way.

I'm also establishing a time limitation before a deck is added here.  If a new deck has been posted for a week or more and it clearly will not be changed in the future, then it will be added.  Please do not panic if your deck is not immediately added within a week.  If you honestly cannot bear the suspense/have 0 patience, then there are several logical explanations to this happening including:  I'm away on vacation (check the last time I was online), Comcast decides to turn off my internet access yet again for no reason (check the last time I was online), or my girlfriend has locked me in our basement which doesn't exist (again, check the last time I was online).

Other stuff to note...let's see.
-The "Reserved." post is there in case my first post somehow manages to exceed the gargantuan character limit set in place on each post.  I don't foresee this happening twice, so hopefully that one "Reserved." will suffice.
-There is no Mark listed beneath the PSNbow section.  Why?  For one:  There is no PSNbow that runs an mark.  Two:  It's the exact same as running Amethyst Towers and will therefore be categorized there by default.  If I see someone suddenly create an Mark PSNbow to be funny then I might "accidentally" move that deck to the humor section...
-Decks with multiple quanta sources (Quantum Towers + Elemental Towers, etc.)...eh, that's harder to judge.  I'll probably categorize it based on which quanta source it has more of.  If they're the exact same number then I'll always put it in either the Elemental Tower or PSNbow section; god knows we have enough Quantum Tower based Speedbows already.  If it's evenly split between Pends and Towers then I'll just let the community spank you until I figure out what to do with it.
-Incorrect deck images, incorrect links, etc.  As long as it's not a deck request, feel free to report it here.  There's a good chance I may have incorrectly inserted a link to a real life picture of Napalm Grenade in place of a Deck link, so it really pays off to double check my work in case I'm wrong.
-Why isn't this thread stickied?  Yeah I wondered if I should do that or not.  It's very useful, but then again so are threads like the TTW Study and they've never gotten that same treatment.  So for now it stays like it is.  If it somehow manages to get buried beneath all the fantastic decks we have in this section, then go stalk my Profile and I'll have it linked in my signature.

Stay tuned for more updates~

[ddevans96]

I have questions about variants in the opening post on any given speedbow thread.

Someone makes a thread with his new speedbow. The variant at the top of the thread contains a PSNbow with Mark of Light, and below the deck he posts a rainbow with Light Towers. Other than these, the decks are exactly the same.

Which one (or both) goes into this list?

On a similar note, let's say I were to make a max-speed, rainbow variant of my PSNtrio, that meets all your requirements. I love this twist and so put it in my opening post, below the primary deck. Would this variant be allowed in this list, even though it is not the primary deck of the thread?
Note: I do not currently intend to do this in the near future, I am just using it as an example.

[willng3]

I have questions about variants in the opening post on any given speedbow thread.

Someone makes a thread with his new speedbow. The variant at the top of the thread contains a PSNbow with Mark of Light, and below the deck he posts a rainbow with Light Towers. Other than these, the decks are exactly the same.

Which one (or both) goes into this list?

If there's enough differentiation between the two (i.e. not just switching the Pends and Mark around and calling it a new deck) then I'll probably post them both in their appropriate sections, so in most cases they'll get their own place in both areas.

On a similar note, let's say I were to make a max-speed, rainbow variant of my PSNtrio, that meets all your requirements. I love this twist and so put it in my opening post, below the primary deck. Would this variant be allowed in this list, even though it is not the primary deck of the thread?
Note: I do not currently intend to do this in the near future, I am just using it as an example.

Ah yeah I had forgotten about this.  At the current moment, I believe there are only 1 or 2 decks that meet that criteria and I stumbled across them by chance when I first started compiling this list by:
1)  Searching the Deck Ideas section for the code for 4 Supernova.
2)  Searching through that list for decks which fit the criteria.
However as I did this I quickly realized that the Search Engine now only gives me 1 page of results when I specifically recall it giving me multiple in the past.  Since that obviously wasn't going to work, I had to stick to manually searching through each and every page of the Rainbow Decks section as the "best" alternative.  I don't plan to comb through the other sections because I'm almost positive 95% of it will be a waste of time and I'll die of boredom/insanity.  So I guess the best solution would be to just PM me the deck thread if I've missed it and then I'll see if I can't post it.

Although I do strongly discourage users from modifying each and every little deck to make it worthy of being added here...it just shouldn't work that way.
EDIT:  In fact, if I see an old deck with a Rainbow SN Variation that has a timestamp matching right...now, then it's not getting added.